butchna
Sit down and tell me all about it...way over there
- Joined
- Jan 6, 2013
- Messages
- 105,869
- Likes
- 220,569
“Potentially expensive” to whom? NIL stuff isn’t AD money. Stacking quarterbacks like Bama, tOSU and (recently) UGA has never been realistic for the norm, but signing the best available face of the program signalcaller each year is perfectly so.I wasn't saying it's impossible to sign a top qb recruit every cycle, just that it's potentially expensive and still doesn't guarantee depth, because of the transfer portal. Sorry if it seemed like I was saying UT can't or shouldn't sign Merklinger because that wasn't my intent. I was adding to allvolrecruiting's point about signing elite qb's every year and saying that I think it's an increasingly hard position to stack talent three deep or even have a reasonably seasoned backup.
As for Georgia, I'd rather they'd signed one in the 23 class, but I'm not privy to their information or reasoning. Maybe they'd have gone harder after a lower rated guy if they expect multiple transfers this spring, or maybe they figure the portal is a better option. Roster management has been handled well so far, but college coaches all acknowledge that the portal is a constant threat to their depth chart.
Last edited: