JustaChicken
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Mar 12, 2016
- Messages
- 831
- Likes
- 1,890
I appreciate the time you spent getting those numbers together but I still stand by what I said. You most certainly DO have players on your team this year that were highly rated out of HS. Dawn didn't have that when she came to SC. That's a fact. & it's not Dawn's fault that your highly rated players out of high school haven't been developed as they should have.Actually she didn't do anything for three seasons that coach Kellie has done in her first. We don't have three four AA's we have players that were rated AA's and half are not upperclassmen. Our bench is one of the worst in the SEC. Hype all you want Dawn took three years to get to where Kellie is now. Schaeffer actually had a good year his third year and fourth a little better. I am deadly serious as to the record she has produced with a new system and only two effective players. I'll even give Dawn a pass in year one when she went 2 and 12 in the SEC, but in the next two seasons 7 and 9 and 8 and 8 and even in the fourth 10 and 6 and in the fifth 11 and 5. So you want to start the BS the stats don't lie. First five years SEC finish 11th, 7th, tie for 5th, tie for 4th, tie for 4th so there you go. First five seasons SEC record 38 and 40. Schaeffer SEC 5 and 11 first year, 5 and 11 second year, 11 and 5 third year, 11 and 5 fourth year. 32 and 32 in the SEC first four seasons. I bet Kellie beats both those records easily in her first three years.
Are you really suggesting that if Dawn had taken over the SC program with the talent you have on your team this year that she would have only won 2 SEC games?! That is preposterous. You are clearly looking through orange tinted glasses my friend.
If Kellie had started from the bottom up as Dawn has done then we could start making comparisons. But SC hadn't won a thing when Dawn got here. UT still has its name & tradition plus previous titles it could sell to recruits. It's nowhere near the same situation.