LadyVols_WBK
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jun 13, 2020
- Messages
- 5,401
- Likes
- 16,047
How do you know they feel they "need to hire their husbands in order to make their lives work"? That seems like a very sexist assumption to me. And so negative. Since, as you say, so many women coaches are doing it could it be they want (not need) to work with their husbands and it works out for their lives? The Harpers have been doing it for years. You sure it's because of some "need" you wish Kellie could get rid of?
If true, all hail Jon. And also to the post coach!
Don't apologize. I love these ladies on this board and wish I the basketball knowledge most of them on this board have. But, saying that, it seems to me that too many are looking for a sexist remark where none exist. When that happens they are like a dog with a rag doll. Sorry ladies, I have a wife of 54 years, a daughter of 50 years, and now a granddaughter of 16 who have taught me gender fairness, and do not see any sexist remarks hereLOL! Well, no. I have no desire for her to get rid of Jon, and I never said I did.
I had simply brought up the subject when I heard three separate references to men being on their wives’ staffs, but have only once ever heard of a wife being on her husbands’s staff. The husbands of Adia Barnes, Kristy Curry, Shea Ralph and Kellie came up today.
I just find it to be an interesting microcosm of society in general, and commented on it. That’s all.
Now, I’’m admit it turned my head how much improved Tamari was this year. And then recently when I heard Jon was the guards coach and we had way too much trouble bringing the ball up the floor in the last few games, I did, again, wonder …
All that said, I would NOT choose for Jon to be replaced. This entire team’s chemistry is perfect as it is, and coaches are a huge part of what makes that chemistry good. I assume Jon is good for this team!
I also understand 100% why having married coaches is good in many ways.
I also think most people are completely missing my point of even mentioning it. And that’s okay!
If I missed your point I'm sorry. I thought your point was that women coaches are sacrificing, and once again bearing an unfair share of the family burden, by hiring their husbands. My point was we don't know that, and it seemed a bit condescending to the women to assume they all knuckled under to societal pressure.I also think most people are completely missing my point of even mentioning it. And that’s okay!
And see there’s that man ‘splaining thing again. Just having female relatives does not mean you have come down from the mountain with the last word on sexist comments. Sounds like those female relatives keep you on your toes,however, so good on you all.Don't apologize. I love these ladies on this board and wish I the basketball knowledge most of them on this board have. But, saying that, it seems to me that too many are looking for a sexist remark where none exist. When that happens they are like a dog with a rag doll. Sorry ladies, I have a wife of 54 years, a daughter of 50 years, and now a granddaughter of 16 who have taught me gender fairness, and do not see any sexist remarks here
I totally and officially cannot stand Howard. And I hope she plays for KY for 10 more years. They'll be better when they're rid of her. Selfish and pouty.
Please don't make us agonize over Key's injury. Sure glad there's no game this week.
Keyen Green! May have to do it alot more. She'll never lack effort or be selfish.
BTW, my post about the snow not sticking in Knoxville didn't age well. Snowing like the dickens and sticking now. LV fans be careful going home!
So was he the best person to hire for that position then? It sorta gets back to my original point of female coaches too often giving a hire to their spouse when maybe a specialist position coach might have been better.
I like Jon and am happy to have the entire family. My main point in even bringing it up is that I have noticed many, many men getting jobs coaching under their wives. And I often wonder if there might be better choices for filling those positions, but because it’s always the WOMEN who have to “keep the family unit working well,” they don’t always feel free to NOT hire their husband.
She hates the LVs. It kills her to say something good about them. She was talking about our team at halftime then went straight into how great Rhyan Howard was for Ky.Lobo just said she “didn’t expect Tennessee to be as good as they are this year.”
She’s getting ready for the L. I’m so ready for it.
I don't necessarily disagree, However. it is just a peculiar moment in time to bring this up just after we have had our biggest win during our best season in eons.
And see there’s that man ‘spraining thing again.
Hah! Fixed it! Typed it in about three times. Nonetheless, I’m going to keep my eye on that Jon fellow!Hey! Jon was nowhere near Tamari when she got hurt.
Getting serious for a moment, re: the wife-husband partner approach, maybe Jon and Kellie just really, really like being around each other.
For recruits and parents who value a family environment, having this arrangement would seem to be a godsend. You have several proxy moms/sisters, a dad/big brother, and little brother and sis in addition to all your teammate sisterhood.
I get it. But I think Jon is a good coach.So was he the best person to hire for that position then? It sorta gets back to my original point of female coaches too often giving a hire to their spouse when maybe a specialist position coach might have been better.
I like Jon and am happy to have the entire family. My main point in even bringing it up is that I have noticed many, many men getting jobs coaching under their wives. And I often wonder if there might be better choices for filling those positions, but because it’s always the WOMEN who have to “keep the family unit working well,” they don’t always feel free to NOT hire their husband.
Sure. Jon was a guard when he played in college, so he’s never been a post coach per say.