Look, I don't want to get into religioous beliefs; that is too sensitive of a topic.
But people believe in all kinds of sports myths that are not borne out by statistical analyses. Just because you and others believe it is real, doesn't make it true.
In this case, the analysis shows that favored teams win games that should be trap games at a slightly higher rate than those which do not qualify as trap games. Myth busted.
But, let's think about the supposed reason why this game would be a "trap game"--the LVs are looking past Missouri and thinking about Uconn. So how would that work exactly?
Last Thursday evening, the LVs beat Florida. Kellie comes into the locker room and says "great win, now we have less than 72 hours to get ready for Mizzou." During the ensuing 72 (or less) hours, the team is immersed in game film, scouting reports and game planning.
How likely do you think it is that during all that Missouri prep, the players are zoned out thinking about playing Uconn?
Looking past an opponent is a luxury for fans but players' boom-boom-boom game schedules are not designed for that to happen. The rationale for this being a trap game does not make practical sense.
Now, there are scenarios where the LVs lose this game; they could shoot poorly from the 3pt line and the FT line (which has happened this season a few times); Jordan Horston could get into early foul (which has happened on a few occasions); Rickea could forget to pack her superman cape among other possibilities.
If some combination of those scenarios happens, the LVs could lose the game but it would not be because it was a "trap game" where they were psychologically distracted. It is because bad games sometimes happen to good teams.