Sometimes a loss is the best thing that can happen when a win just delays the inevitable and prolongs the suffering.
Suppose for instance Dooley had won an additional game and kept his job longer, that would have been the absolute worst thing that could have happened. It was the worst case scenario. He had already failed to recruit enough offensive linemen and the cupboard was about to be completely bare at that position (sound familiar).
The problem is that people have different opinions about when you have reached the point where a loss is better for the long term health of the program than a win would be. But it isn't hard to understand the sentiment.
Big difference. Dooley was going to be fired if he lost to Vandy. Holly is not going to be fired this year. So a bad L accomplishes nothing productive, while even an ugly W gives the LVs the chance to play another game.
Survive and advance. Maybe the LVs will play better Sunday. If not, losing to a 2 seed is preferable than losing to a 10 seed.