Chris89128
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Nov 2, 2012
- Messages
- 809
- Likes
- 974
Funny how people see things differently. I thought when Middleton came in we took off on a run in the first half. It just seems like we have a better flow going when she is in there but we will see when the competition gets tougher.
Carter is the best defender on the team but Middleton just brings that "it" factor. The team chemistry is better with her. She is the best passer on the team. And, if there is one thing this team needs it is great passers. Middleton and Reynolds are the two best passers. As long as they have one or the other on the floor at all times the offense should flow.
Fact: Burdick is not a consistent shooter
Fact: She is a sloppy passer
Fact: She led the team with 5 TO's last night
Fact: She has underachieved at UT
Fact: She has a great attitude at times and is a good rebounder
Fact: She gets too much playing time
I wasn't talking about you specifically, so don't take it so personal. You talk about the past and even though we want to get back to that type of national contention level, we just won't get there degrading these young ladies and coaching staff for decisions made. I'm sure half the people commenting on the lady vols and their play and the way Holly coaches has 1) never stepped foot on a basketball court and 2) have never been on the sideline coaching adults. If your are a parent you can kind of relate that it is hard enough to get your child to do what you want at all times, let alone expect it from adults. Lets stop downing these young women who I'm sure read forums like these to get a feel for how their fan base is reacting to their play. They need encouragement from their fans not criticism, they get enough of that from the coaches!
I am not taking it personally. I was trying to understand your position. There is a difference between discussing how a team and its players perform on the court and making degrading personal attacks on their character motivation, or insulting them. I am with you that latter should not be on a fan board but analysis of what players are doing well as well what they could improve upon is what these boards are basically about.
The LVs have a preponderance of McDonalds All-Americans, who have come up through very competitive AAU programs and they have signed on to play at a premier program. The program brings big crowds, media coverage and high fan expectations. So, the LVs are a bit different from your 8th grade rec league and they can handle more than "good job; great effort; you tried SO hard" feedback. I understand competitive college athletics very well and from the inside. I seriously doubt that the comments on fan boards have much bearing on their outlooks or performances.
I am not taking it personally. I was trying to understand your position. There is a difference between discussing how a team and its players perform on the court and making degrading personal attacks on their character motivation, or insulting them. I am with you that latter should not be on a fan board but analysis of what players are doing well as well what they could improve upon is what these boards are basically about.
The LVs have a preponderance of McDonalds All-Americans, who have come up through very competitive AAU programs and they have signed on to play at a premier program. The program brings big crowds, media coverage and high fan expectations. So, the LVs are a bit different from your 8th grade rec league and they can handle more than "good job; great effort; you tried SO hard" feedback. I understand competitive college athletics very well and from the inside. I seriously doubt that the comments on fan boards have much bearing on their outlooks or performances.