Since you're looking to make comparisons, and play whataboutism, I'll bite. Why did the FBI pursue Flynn so vigorously, going so far as to threaten his son, to coerce him into a confession, yet despite claims by Comey they had enough evidence to prove Hillary had lied about sending/receiving classified materials they let her off scot free? It's almost like they were pursuing some kind of political agenda. Imagine if while going after Hillary, they threatened Chelsea. And let's not forget, more evidence surfaced in Hillary's case in the form of some of the missing emails. But why actually acknowledge facts when you can play Captain Moral Equivalence. I guess it's okay for you to pick up the cape and run with it? More like Captain Hypocrite, IMO.