George Santos (aka Kitara Ravache): The Fabulous Fabulist

#176
#176
BowlBrother85 said:
... and didn't anyone else here have a mother who would always respond with, "Two wrongs don't make a right," when you tried to deflect your bad behavior onto a sibling? My mom said it all the time, and it's as good a response as there is to people who think "what-about-isms" serve as a defense for misconduct.
Click to expand...

I think the whataboutism in this context is "Looks like Santos should take a lashing for this... so who else that fits the bill should go down?".

If person X(D) and person Y(R) both do Z but only one (doesn't matter which) really takes any heat for it then it isn't the kind of whatabout like you posit. Under that scenario there isn't a whatabout regarding defense of action but rather the application of same standards. It's a legit observation. (And again it being a D or R shouldn't matter)
 
  • Like
Reactions: NurseGoodVol, ClearwaterVol and AM64
#177
#177
Rasputin_Vol said:




Click to expand...


For years people just credited joe with gaffes when he spouted questionable "fact". Apparently it's been a mix of outright lies and just whatever came off the top of his head - usually wrong because he never bothered to find out the truth of the matter. Apparently innuendo and speaking without knowledge are just OK for a lot of people ... at least 81M of them and most of the media.
 
  • Like
Reactions: StarRaider
#178
#178
Just who in Hell here on my side supports Santos? Nobody..Now throw your own lying POS trash out as well, or be called a cult member. **** this is nauseating
 
  • Like
Reactions: StarRaider
#179
#179
BowlBrother85 said:
... and didn't anyone else here have a mother who would always respond with, "Two wrongs don't make a right," when you tried to deflect your bad behavior onto a sibling? My mom said it all the time, and it's as good a response as there is to people who think "what-about-isms" serve as a defense for misconduct.
Click to expand...
Yet you consistently use whataboutism when defending the left.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64 and StarRaider
#180
#180
AM64 said:
For years people just credited joe with gaffes when he spouted questionable "fact". Apparently it's been a mix of outright lies and just whatever came off the top of his head - usually wrong because he never bothered to find out the truth of the matter. Apparently innuendo and speaking without knowledge are just OK for a lot of people ... at least 81M of them and most of the media.
Click to expand...

Joe is a known plagiarist. But he still got elected.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64, StarRaider and hog88
#182
#182
Weezer said:
Joe is a known plagiarist. But he still got elected.
Click to expand...

So, lemme guess, your old tired fart argument is George Santos is really the same as Joe Biden because Joe quoted Kinnock in a debate without attribution (he had credited Kinnock when he paraphrased him in campaign stops). Taking and using another person's words without citation totally seems to be on all fours with someone who: (1) lies about working for Goldman; (2) lies about working for Citibank; (3) lies about his ethnicity; (4) lies about going to college; (5) lies about the high school he went to; (6) lies about his wealth; (7) lies about his relationship to two national tragedies. And all of this was done during just 1 campaign. Do I got that right, Cap'n Moral Equivalence?
 
#183
#183
evillawyer said:
So, lemme guess, your old tired fart argument is George Santos is really the same as Joe Biden because Joe quoted Kinnock in a debate without attribution (he had credited Kinnock when he paraphrased him in campaign stops). Taking and using another person's words without citation totally seems to be on all fours with someone who: (1) lies about working for Goldman; (2) lies about working for Citibank; (3) lies about his ethnicity; (4) lies about going to college; (5) lies about the high school he went to; (6) lies about his wealth; (7) lies about his relationship to two national tragedies. And all of this was done during just 1 campaign. Do I got that right, Cap'n Moral Equivalence?
Click to expand...
As per usual, no, you didn't get it right. This is why we broke up.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64 and StarRaider
#184
#184
I mean, technically speaking, didn't most of our grandparents survive the Holocaust in the same way we all survived 9/11 -- by not being there.
 
#188
#188
We've probably been looking at things all wrong or some time thinking that politicians are part time liars. It's probably more like habitual liars are attracted to politics because that's like the super bowl for liars.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NurseGoodVol
#189
#189
StarRaider said:
The real reason the left hates George Santos is because he's the first ever gay jewish catholic hispanic black caucasian son of immigrants Ivy League graduate cancer survivor Republican member of Congress whose ancestors survived the Holocaust and died on 9/11.
Click to expand...

Dems are jealous because their tiny little brains can't hit that level of imagination. Some like joe and the clintons are really in close proximity, though. Joe tries - bless his heart, but his brain is seriously atrophied.
 
  • Like
Reactions: W.TN.Orange Blood and StarRaider
#191
#191
Three cheers for Georgie boy, Santos! He's just another Republiar for rightists to champion. Santos! Santos Santos!
1672401755728.png
So too, those who advocate or vote for known liars.
 
#195
#195
AM64 said:
For years people just credited joe with gaffes when he spouted questionable "fact". Apparently it's been a mix of outright lies and just whatever came off the top of his head - usually wrong because he never bothered to find out the truth of the matter. Apparently innuendo and speaking without knowledge are just OK for a lot of people ... at least 81M of them and most of the media.
Click to expand...

I'd go with closer to 160M because Trump was a lie machine, as well.
 
  • Like
Reactions: EasternVol
#196
#196
Orangeburst said:
Just who in Hell here on my side supports Santos? Nobody..Now throw your own lying POS trash out as well, or be called a cult member. **** this is nauseating
Click to expand...

The proof comes in the next 2 weeks. The Repubs will seat him because McCarthy needs his vote. If you seat him, you support him.

So it seems he does have support. Besides, you guys have a lot more lying POS trash to go. Quit acting like you're the party of truth and justice. Breaking the law is a Repub tradition. Goes from Trump all the way down to a Knox County mayor signing time cards for his no show to work boy-toy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ClearwaterVol
#197
#197
WBO said:
The proof comes in the next 2 weeks. The Repubs will seat him because McCarthy needs his vote. If you seat him, you support him.

So it seems he does have support. Besides, you guys have a lot more lying POS trash to go. Quit acting like you're the party of truth and justice. Breaking the law is a Repub tradition. Goes from Trump all the way down to a Knox County mayor signing time cards for his no show to work boy-toy.
Click to expand...

I don't support him because McCarthy does. That isn't logic.

I admitted we have trash..just asking you guys to do the same.. Your logic sucks.

And your trashy party sucks as well.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64, W.TN.Orange Blood, whodeycin85 and 2 others
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top