Georgia's 2023 Schedule

What does that have to do with Vanderbilt? Simply being in a Power 5 conference does not make for strong competition. Your statement about Georgia "only playing 9 Power 5 teams in the regular season" was weak.
You have been asked several times what plan you have that would fix this, and all you do is repeat their 2023 sucks and after they lost OU from the schedule for this year, they could have scheduled some nebulous available P5 team without saying what team was available.

Your childish insult attempt seems to ignore the fact no one is defending that schedule as difficult and agree it is pathetically weak. But virtually everyone on this thread has a better grasp on the vagaries of scheduling than you do. I suspect Kirby Smart is not happy with his schedule as they have not been shy at scheduling a Top P5 program in home and homes, but this is the hand they were dealt.
 
  • Like
Reactions: VolNExile
You have been asked several times what plan you have that would fix this, and all you do is repeat their 2023 sucks and after they lost OU from the schedule for this year, they could have scheduled some nebulous available P5 team without saying what team was available.

Your childish insult attempt seems to ignore the fact no one is defending that schedule as difficult and agree it is pathetically weak. But virtually everyone on this thread has a better grasp on the vagaries of scheduling than you do. I suspect Kirby Smart is not happy with his schedule as they have not been shy at scheduling a Top P5 program in home and homes, but this is the hand they were dealt.
I'm not talking about placing blame anymore. We will just have to agree to disagree. I believe they could have replaced Oklahoma with a better opponent. You feel differently ... and I don't care.
 
I'm not talking about placing blame anymore. We will just have to agree to disagree. I believe they could have replaced Oklahoma with a better opponent. You feel differently ... and I don't care.
Wait! I bet South-Central Louisiana State University was available.
 
  • Like
Reactions: VolNExile
Wait! I bet South-Central Louisiana State University was available.
The way the American Athletic Conference has been hemorrhaging schools lately, I bet that if Georgia had tried to schedule Tulsa, East Carolina, SMU, UConn or Memphis, they probably could have worked something out. That was not what Georgia wanted, however.

When Georgia is scheduling a non-conference opponent, they either want a "name" team from the Power 5, or they want a pure cupcake. They don't gain anything by beating teams in between ... so why play someone who they might actually have to prepare for, and play their starters for more than half the game with? I understand the logic, but it still leaves them with a very soft schedule, and regardless of what you say, the non-conference schedule didn't have to be as weak as it is.
 
The way the American Athletic Conference has been hemorrhaging schools lately, I bet that if Georgia had tried to schedule Tulsa, East Carolina, SMU, UConn or Memphis, they probably could have worked something out. That was not what Georgia wanted, however.

When Georgia is scheduling a non-conference opponent, they either want a "name" team from the Power 5, or they want a pure cupcake. They don't gain anything by beating teams in between ... so why play someone who they might actually have to prepare for, and play their starters for more than half the game with? I understand the logic, but it still leaves them with a very soft schedule, and regardless of what you say, the non-conference schedule didn't have to be as weak as it is.
I’ll give you credit for one thing: you’re obstinate as hell.
 
The thing about people not playing Alabama regularly is about to be solved, probably in 2024. When Texas and OU join and we go to the 3/6/6 schedule model, everyone in the conference, including UGA and UF will play Bama at least every other year. Also, in regard to UF and UGA playing in Jacksonville, while it's true they never play each other on the road, they never play each other at home either, that equalizes it, would you trade not going to Gainesville, for not ever playing Florida in Neyland and instead playing all of our games against them in Jacksonville, Florida? If anyone, that arrangement benefits Florida, since Jacksonville, FL is a hell of alot closer to Gainesville than Athens, GA (or Knoxville, TN).

I think Gainesville is probably a harder place to win than Athens, although admittedly that is really just my opinion. Losing a home game doesn’t equalize it in my humble opinion. Every SEC team would conceivably have to play there at some point, except Georgia which will never have to. And the distance thing is overblown, it isn’t a crazier long distance for Georgia to travel and the ticket split is still 50/50.

All in all UGA traditionally doesn’t travel far to play any away games. Next year I’m not even sure they leave more than a couple hundred miles from the Georgia border until the playoffs.

I freely admit some of this is AU sucks and they got a big break with the OK cancellation. It just sticks in my crawl we have to go to Tuscaloosa and Gainesville every other year while Florida and Bama have been consistently tough since the conference division split, and UGA might have to go to Tuscaloosa once a decade.

I don’t care about easy or hard schedules, but it’s clear that since the division split some teams have an easier path than others.
 
Kirby Smart has stated he wants to go home and home with Florida. The reason is he cannot host and talk to recruits at a neutral site and at least every other year, he would have a big time opportunity to recruit, as if he needed it.

It is south Georgia that wants to keep the game.
 
The way the American Athletic Conference has been hemorrhaging schools lately, I bet that if Georgia had tried to schedule Tulsa, East Carolina, SMU, UConn or Memphis, they probably could have worked something out. That was not what Georgia wanted, however.

When Georgia is scheduling a non-conference opponent, they either want a "name" team from the Power 5, or they want a pure cupcake. They don't gain anything by beating teams in between ... so why play someone who they might actually have to prepare for, and play their starters for more than half the game with? I understand the logic, but it still leaves them with a very soft schedule, and regardless of what you say, the non-conference schedule didn't have to be as weak as it is.
Yeah. It only as weak as it is because of the SEC. They dont control who they play in the SEC.

GA is playing 8 SEC and one game against a 5-7 ACC team. Still.
TN is playing 8 SEC and one game against a 3-7 ACC team.

Your argument is that Georgia should be able to reschedule whoever they want, whenever they want. Or schedule 10 P5 games so they can still play 9 when one backs out. You have such an unreasonable standard.
 
Schedule someone better than UT Martin. It could have been done ... but I'm also tired of talking about this.
at the drop of a dime?

They lost money from losing the OK game, they lost money buying out UTM, and you expect them to lose even more money to bring in someone else.

They scheduled UT Martin 3 years in advance. They scheduled Oklahoma 4 years in advance. Meaning they were only planning to play UTM AFTER they already had OK on the books.

They were able to get Ball State in 1 year because they paid them 1.6 million.

There were no better options. You are being unreasonable.
 
at the drop of a dime?

They lost money from losing the OK game, they lost money buying out UTM, and you expect them to lose even more money to bring in someone else.

They scheduled UT Martin 3 years in advance. They scheduled Oklahoma 4 years in advance. Meaning they were only planning to play UTM AFTER they already had OK on the books.

They were able to get Ball State in 1 year because they paid them 1.6 million.

There were no better options. You are being unreasonable.
I'm not talking about that anymore. It's been covered.
 
Let's put aside "blame" .... and for the sake of not having an argument, let's all agree that Georgia's 2023 schedule is as tough as it could possibly have been under the circumstances, and nobody is to blame for either the weakness of their SEC opponents or for their non-conference opponents ...

That is still a very soft schedule, any way you look at it. Those first 7 games, especially.

Some things to think about :

  • In the entire months of September and October, Georgia will only play on an opponent's home field twice and one of those games is at Vanderbilt. This is obviously counting Georgia's game with Florida in Jacksonville on October 28th, as being a neutral site game, and Georgia even has a bye the week before playing Florida.
  • Auburn could have a good season. There are many variables with that program in 2023, but there is a good chance that Georgia will not play a ranked opponent until Kentucky on October 7th ... and Kentucky will only be ranked because they also play an easy schedule (as always) to start the season.
  • Unless Auburn does have a better than expected season, Tennessee will be the only ranked opponent that Georgia plays on the road in 2023. Once again, that is counting their game with Florida in Jacksonville as being a neutral site game.
* There is an Auburn variable at work here ... but if Auburn is as bad as they were in 2022, then the first half of Georgia's 2023 schedule is one of the easiest slates I've ever seen for an SEC team.

I hate playing devil's advocate for Georgia, but here it goes.

1. The Eastern Division. Tennessee has finally returned to relevancy and I believe will remain there. But, it's been a while. Florida had some good teams under Mullen before crashing into a brick wall. But, by and large, they haven't been what they were. South Carolina, Missouri, Kentucky and Vanderbilt being ranked is generally rare. So, that's the division and it's not too difficult.

2. Auburn. Their automatic opponent in the West. They have been Jekyll and Hyde. Sometimes good, sometimes bad. You don't know exactly what you'll get and like the division, Georgia has no control over this.

3. Georgia Tech and the OOC. Now, I will ignore 2020 because it was an all-conference year due to COVID. But, I could have sworn Georgia played Notre Dame in 2017 and 2019, Clemson in 2021, and Oregon in 2022. They can't do anything about Tech, but it's not like they've scheduled cupcakes year after year.

Georgia has the exact situation with the schedule that Florida does. When they play at Georgia Tech, it's another game in the state of Georgia. And unlike Florida playing at Florida State, it's basically a home game or 50/50 split when they play at Tech. And the game in Jax is a neutral site game. Tech is not in their control. And Florida and Georgia aren't dumping 100 years of tradition just because it happens to make some people upset that they don't have to play on each other's home field. Too bad. So sad.

All I will say is that it's amazing how weak a schedule can look once you have a good football team. Part of the anger of what you all had to experience the last several years and what I as a Florida fan am experiencing now, is that we're not losing games because the schedule is tough. We're losing games because we're not good. At most, an Eastern division team has 4 ranked teams on the schedule. 2 are likely to be on the road. 2 are likely to be at home. Split those games and you are looking at a 10-2 season. Even dropping all 4, you are 8-4.

And then, after all of that is said and done.....Georgia is playing an SEC title game, and two playoff games.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ZippyMorocco

VN Store



Back
Top