Ghost candidates: A new way for the GOP to cheat

#77
#77
lawgator1 said:
The crimes were financial and corporate disclosure, but you cannot evade the fact that the purpose was to get R's elected. That one of the schemers used to be a Dem doesn't change that. (Trump used to be a Dem, too).
Click to expand...
His "used to be" was still active the year of the crime.

But I really dont think the labels matters when money is getting thrown around. And I very much doubt he cared who got elected in the end, as long as he got his.

I have still yet to see anything that makes the candidate a fraudulent candidate, beyond participating in the financial/corporate fraud. Sounds like everything was filled out correctly. Anyone has always been able to run under whatever guise they wanted, and that fundamentally means they want to pull votes from other candidates who may have won if fewer people had campaigned.

The Artilles case seems like a much better argument for R tampering. At least there actual Rs are listed.
 
#78
#78
LouderVol said:
His "used to be" was still active the year of the crime.

But I really dont think the labels matters when money is getting thrown around. And I very much doubt he cared who got elected in the end, as long as he got his.

I have still yet to see anything that makes the candidate a fraudulent candidate, beyond participating in the financial/corporate fraud. Sounds like everything was filled out correctly. Anyone has always been able to run under whatever guise they wanted, and that fundamentally means they want to pull votes from other candidates who may have won if fewer people had campaigned.

The Artilles case seems like a much better argument for R tampering. At least there actual Rs are listed.
Click to expand...
Ghost candidates violate the spirit of proper elections?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Wireless1
#80
#80
  • Like
Reactions: volfanhill
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top