Global Warming not real???/

#26
#26
We've had snow the last three weekends. Today it was almost 50 degrees. Should I head for the hills?

What would Al have me to do?
 
#29
#29
When a bull eats grass and it floats around inside their body for a day or so, it ends up feeding the bull but the leftovers are discharged with vociferous heat and fervor so you end up with a bunch of Bull SHeet.

If you run a quadratic equation it looks like this:

Global Warming = Hot fresh Bull Sheet.
 
#30
#30
When a bull eats grass and it floats around inside their body for a day or so, it ends up feeding the bull but the leftovers are discharged so if you run a quadratic equation it looks like this:

Global Warming = Bull ****.
 
#31
#31
RockyTopVol said:
"We called the Weather Bureau and found out what historically was the hottest day of the summer. So we scheduled the hearing that day, and bingo, it was the hottest day on record in Washington, or close to it." - Former U.S. Senator Timothy Wirth ( D., Colo. ) :eek:lol:
Click to expand...

You can't mock him for that, but then mock any hearings that take place in the winter when it snows or is cold... That's having your cake and eating it too.
 
#32
#32
Volsurance said:
If you run a quadratic equation it looks like this:

Global Warming = Hot fresh Bull Sheet.
Click to expand...

Climate scientists withdraw journal claims of rising sea levels.

"The temperature records cannot be relied on as indicators of global change," said John Christy, professor of atmospheric science at the University of Alabama in Huntsville, a former lead author on the IPCC.

The doubts of Christy and a number of other researchers focus on the thousands of weather stations around the world, which have been used to collect temperature data over the past 150 years. These stations, they believe, have been seriously compromised by factors such as urbanisation, changes in land use and, in many cases, being moved from site to site.

Christy has published research papers looking at these effects in three different regions: east Africa, and the American states of California and Alabama. "The story is the same for each one," he said. "The popular data sets show a lot of warming but the apparent temperature rise was actually caused by local factors affecting the weather stations, such as land development."

---------------------------------------

Bottom line is that the UN IPCC and others who support their efforts have cherry picked and manipulated data that supports their hypothesis and trashed data that doesn't.
 
#34
#34
IPorange said:
You can't mock him for that, but then mock any hearings that take place in the winter when it snows or is cold... That's having your cake and eating it too.
Click to expand...

Are you talking about Nopenhagen or one of Al-gore's get togethers???

BTW, since climategate Gore has been hard to find, I read a discussion the other day about setting up an "Al Gore sighting" internet site to see if he can be tracked down.
 
#35
#35
gsvol said:
Are you talking about Nopenhagen or one of Al-gore's get togethers???

BTW, since climategate Gore has been hard to find, I read a discussion the other day about setting up an "Al Gore sighting" internet site to see if he can be tracked down.
Click to expand...

The Abominable Snowman........:)
 
#36
#36
rwemyss said:
I have no idea what you have stated here... scientific method would look like this:

1) Form Hypothesis - "Global climate change is not anthropogenic, but a system in chaos."

2) Experiment to gain knowledge that is intended to prove or disprove said hypothesis.

It works the same way for AGW'ers... or are you just complaining that skeptics test data that is intended by AGW'ers to prove their hypothesis?
Click to expand...

Well scientific method is supposed to work like this: "i'm going to try such and such; my hypothesis is this will happen; then at the end, you give your results"

When you go into something saying "I'm going to find stuff/data that proves this point" it's no longer science, it's actually moved much more towards the fields arguing or debating....you're just looking alone for data that proves your (or the guy paying you's) point of view, not looking for the general, neutral "see what happens here"

really the frustration was more towards when this happens; which i do have to say, again, both sides do it....but at times it seems it's a little more seen in the scientists with the senators trying to argue against the whole GW idea
 
#37
#37
RockyTopVol said:
The Abominable Snowman........:)
Click to expand...

No forgetty the Yeti.

igloo.jpg


Or Elvis??

polar-bears-roasting-penguin.gif


TrueOrange said:
Well scientific method is supposed to work like this: "i'm going to try such and such; my hypothesis is this will happen; then at the end, you give your results"

When you go into something saying "I'm going to find stuff/data that proves this point" it's no longer science, it's actually moved much more towards the fields arguing or debating....you're just looking alone for data that proves your (or the guy paying you's) point of view, not looking for the general, neutral "see what happens here"

really the frustration was more towards when this happens; which i do have to say, again, both sides do it....but at times it seems it's a little more seen in the scientists with the senators trying to argue against the whole GW idea
Click to expand...

What happens in a real debate.
 
#38
#38
Volsurance said:
When a bull eats grass and it floats around inside their body for a day or so, it ends up feeding the bull but the leftovers are discharged with vociferous heat and fervor so you end up with a bunch of Bull SHeet.

If you run a quadratic equation it looks like this:

Global Warming = Hot fresh Bull Sheet.
Click to expand...

Aww. That's cute. Do you come up with that yourself?
 
#41
#41
RockyTopVol said:
Will the DOJ get involved? Al needs to answer to this. I was just about to post this myself.

Climategate Meets the Law: Senator Inhofe to Ask for DOJ Investigation

Calling Al, where are you?
Click to expand...

If AG Holder has anything to do with this, and he is the man in charge, the DOJ won't do a thing.

Maybe Inhofe can bring enough pressure though, who knows?

Here is a good article that doesn't get too technical to easily understand and takes a common sense view of the topic.

Global warming is good for the environment!

Al%20Gore%20Cancels%20$1,200%20Per%20Handshake%20Event%20In%20Copenhagen.jpg
 
#44
#44
IPorange said:
Sounds familiar.
Click to expand...

Here comes the sun. :whistling:

February, 2010, was the first month since 2007 with sunspots every day according to Spaceweather.com for February 27. A quick check of February 28 confirms the streak. So far there have been only 2 spot-free days in 2010. By comparison there were 260 spot-free days in 2009, and there have been 772 spot-free days since 2004. What this means is that one of the quietest periods of solar activity in recent history may be coming to an end.

The relevance of this is that sunspot activity has been proposed by many, such as Geerts and Linacre , as a possible driver of Earth's climate patterns, including global warming and cooling cycles.

........ Global Warming theory is considered so sacred and settled that until recently any scientist who questioned the tenets of its conclusion that human activity is the primary driver of climate change were subject to all but ridicule and censure. Recent events, including the Climategate scandal and a series of years where global temperature has stayed about the same, have tempered this attitude.
Click to expand...

English parliament takes a u-turn.


Just over a year ago, just three MPs voted against the Climate Act, with 463 supporting it. .......

But Stringer had done his homework, and through patience and dogged persistence, he began to swing the chairman behind him. Mirroring the collapse in public sympathy for climate science since the scandal broke, the stalwarts so vocal at 3pm were silent by the close.

......... Stringer said scientists make their reputations by proving or disproving what other scientists have done. He forced Jones to admit that contrary to his initial statement, the code wasn’t available for independent scientists to test the work. So how can science progress, Stringer wondered.


........ Previously sympathetic MPs were beginning to be more hostile. ............ (from the chair:) .. “Surely scientific integrity on the world's leading global question should be the question. Have you not miserably failed?”

The University, in another PR blunder, had objected to a statement from the current IC office that the Climategate emails showed prima facie evidence of criminal activity................

Three hours later, the day closed with three big guns of the scientific establishment and most prominent advocates of warming: former IPCC chair Bob Watson, the Government’s chief scientific advisor John Beddington, and head scientist at the Met Office, Julia Slingo OBE. Since the story broke, Watson has been a prominent in emphasising the "Keep Calm and Carry On" message: that the science is untouched, and cannot be questioned.

The three were slightly too chummy and jovial, and seemed unaware of the connection MPs had made: that rotten scientists perhaps mean rotten science.
Click to expand...

josh_peer_review.gif
 
#49
#49
orangeblooded2 said:
Representative Space. The space between your ears.....
Click to expand...

Down snowball, that remark was totally uncalled for.

I bet you are a ton of fun to be around in real life,
I can just see you now.

moron-1.jpg


Again, the real space cadets of the world are
the Gorinski chicken little groupies.

hysteria.gif


800px-Carbon-14_with_activity_labels.png


Here's a sunspot chart showing the various peaks
and dips throughout the past centuries.

Note the "Medieval Max".
It corresponds to the "Medieval Warm Period".

The "Maunder Minimum" corresponds to the
"Little Ice Age", and the "Modern Max" to the
recent warming trend we had been experiencing,
at least until the past several years or so.

If you are upset about Russian methane release
in the Arctic Sea, I'll bet you would simply faint if you
found out there are also volcanoes and hydrothermal
vents all along the under (Arctic) sea Gakkel rift range???
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top