rjd970
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 19, 2007
- Messages
- 24,298
- Likes
- 24,324
I have yet to understand why unions are looked at in a different light than companies. In a laissez faire market, unions are a eventual outcome. Companies want to make as much money for stock owners as possible, unions want to make as much as much money for members as possible. In the case of GM the unions reached too far, and the company didnt have good enough leadership to see that or push back.
how about just paying people what they are worth.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
And in your uninformed opinion, what do you think the auto workers are worth? Easy to make the statement, but making the determination is extrememly difficult. The UAW were overpaid, but by how much?
As usual the conservatives can see nothing positive, even though GM is starting to pay back their loans. AND anyone who thinks it would have been a good idea to let GM go bankrupt, doesn't have a clue
Unions are perfectly acceptable associations of individuals in a free society for a generally rational purpose. What upsets this equation is when the government attempts to intervene to tilt the playing field either towards employers or unions in their negotiations but this is a government intervention issue, not a union issue per se.
how about just paying people what they are worth.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
What is an auto plant worker worth?
What is a shipping room clerk worth?
What is a truckdriver worth?
What is the store manager at Walmart worth?
What is a hedge fund manager worth?
What is a mortage banker worth?
What is a fast food worker worth?
What is a carpenter worth?
What is a plumber worth?
What is a bank teller worth?
What is a load officer worth?
What is store manager at a 7/11 worth?
What is the CEO of Goldman Sachs worth?
And in your uninformed opinion, what do you think the auto workers are worth? Easy to make the statement, but making the determination is extrememly difficult. The UAW were overpaid, but by how much?
As usual the conservatives can see nothing positive, even though GM is starting to pay back their loans. AND anyone who thinks it would have been a good idea to let GM go bankrupt, doesn't have a clue
i can agree on that point, i just get tired of this idea that free market and unions are opposing sides. Unions are a outcome of a free market.
What is an auto plant worker worth?
What is a shipping room clerk worth?
What is a truckdriver worth?
What is the store manager at Walmart worth?
What is a hedge fund manager worth?
What is a mortage banker worth?
What is a fast food worker worth?
What is a carpenter worth?
What is a plumber worth?
What is a bank teller worth?
What is a load officer worth?
What is store manager at a 7/11 worth?
What is the CEO of Goldman Sachs worth?
having the president in your pocket to make your union contracts whole at the expense of hundreds of years of US bankruptcy law while screwing the rightful owners (who would have sued and won if not for vile threats by the president) is the exact opposite of a free market.
I can assure you that the guy driving the fork truck in an auto plant is not worth $25/hr. Neither is the person hitting stop and go on production presses, or the people that assemble stamped parts. orangeblooded will disagree because he is the local union steward, but any reasonable person can understand that a job that you can be trained to do effectively in a week is not worth 50K/yr compensation.
And in your uninformed opinion, what do you think the auto workers are worth? Easy to make the statement, but making the determination is extrememly difficult. The UAW were overpaid, but by how much?
As usual the conservatives can see nothing positive, even though GM is starting to pay back their loans. AND anyone who thinks it would have been a good idea to let GM go bankrupt, doesn't have a clue
Yeah, i agree the unions have a firm grip on the democratic party.
Good thing republicans get no funding from special interest groups, or major companies. That is why we let the major banks fail.
I was not intending to make this political (left/right) with my previous comments, more of a theoretical statement about free markets.
the are worth what the market will bear. i.e worth whatever a competing company is willing to pay for them.
when GM goes bankrupt again because of the many tens of billions of union contracts and benefits what will you say then? sure obama bailed them out today, but what happens when the obligations from the unions come due? allowing gm to fail would have done little to the economy except break the unions. it's pathetic that obama covered his own ass like this.
Do you have any idea the number of workers directly linked to GM's production? YOu don't. There are more companies who are nonunion that are affiliated with GM than ones that are unionized. Cars aren't built at the GM plants, they are built at the Tier 1 manufacturing facilities and most of these are nonunion. Had GM been forced to declare bankruptcy, the economic fallout in small town American would have been disasterous.
Do you have any idea the number of workers directly linked to GM's production? YOu don't. There are more companies who are nonunion that are affiliated with GM than ones that are unionized. Cars aren't built at the GM plants, they are built at the Tier 1 manufacturing facilities and most of these are nonunion. Had GM been forced to declare bankruptcy, the economic fallout in small town American would have been disasterous.
Do you have any idea the number of workers directly linked to GM's production? YOu don't. There are more companies who are nonunion that are affiliated with GM than ones that are unionized. Cars aren't built at the GM plants, they are built at the Tier 1 manufacturing facilities and most of these are nonunion. Had GM been forced to declare bankruptcy, the economic fallout in small town American would have been disasterous.
Any Tier One manufacturer that is supplying solely to GM, rather than diversifying and catering to OEMs across the board, deserves to be shut down for gross stupidity.