Gorsuch refuses to mask up

#554
#554
RockyTop85 said:
Heard a theory that they’re standing by it because the source is a justice.

Basically, the reasoning was that clerks are there for a year. Journalist wouldn’t trust a source this much without some longstanding relationship. I feel like this doesn’t rule out a few other career staffers.
Click to expand...

I am willing to all but guarantee that no justice ever spoke to Totenberg.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NorthDallas40 and Rickyvol77
#557
#557
NorthDallas40 said:
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!! 😂🤡😂🤡

“We deem it irrelevant that the individual whom we claim said something stated unequivocally and on the record he did no such thing and stand by our false dumbassery. We will publish more stupidity later on today backing up our disproven and false claims. “ Freaking beautiful 😂
Click to expand...
After reading the NPR clarification I think I nailed this prediction
 
  • Like
Reactions: McDad and bamawriter
#559
#559
The idiots deleted the non denial denial tweet. They couldn’t handle the heat.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!! 🤣🤡

And they deleted the one EL linked also stating the non denial denial was coming.

I cannot wait to see what these morons do for their next move! 🤣🤣🤣

Edit: it looks like the tweet is back up but a lot of the replies look gone? They can edit those or did Twitter hand them an assist?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: McDad, volinbham and bamawriter
#560
#560
This has the Nick Sandman and Jussie Smollett feel to it. They can't wait for facts because they are so outraged, triggered, and want it to be true so bad.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rickyvol77
#561
#561
just in from NPR

622eoi.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: McDad, VOLS INC., Orange_Vol1321 and 3 others
#562
#562
Orange_Vol1321 said:
This has the Nick Sandman and Jussie Smollett feel to it. They can't wait for facts because they are so outraged, triggered, and want it to be true so bad.
Click to expand...
The facts are already out. Roberts completely torpedoed them. Now they are just trying to find a statement they can sell without doing a full retraction. They’re in too deep at this point.

This is your National Public Radio ladies and gentlemen! Your hard earned tax dollars at work!
 
  • Like
Reactions: McDad, Rickyvol77 and Orange_Vol1321
#568
#568
NorthDallas40 said:
The facts are already out. Roberts completely torpedoed them. Now they are just trying to find a statement they can sell without doing a full retraction. They’re in too deep at this point.

This is your National Public Radio ladies and gentlemen! Your hard earned tax dollars at work!
Click to expand...
Oh I know. Just saying it's another example of what I listed instead of sitting back and giving it time.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NorthDallas40
#573
#573
I don't know this to be true, since I obviously haven't been sitting in on oral arguments at SCOTUS, but multiple journalists who are there regularly have pointed out that the all of the justices have been removing their masks when asking questions. That makes a great deal of sense given that an accurate court record is critically important.

If this is true (and again, I don't know that it is) then it would make no logical sense for Roberts or any other justice to request mask wearing, and it would be perfectly reasonable for Gorsuch to decide to dispense with the pretense. It would also be a wise decision on the part of Sotomayor that she participate remotely.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Vol8188, NorthDallas40, hog88 and 2 others
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top