evillawyer
Kung Fu Kamala, B*tches!
- Joined
- Jan 16, 2010
- Messages
- 31,876
- Likes
- 21,089
IDK if the 8th would apply since this was a civil case and not a criminal. It might not even be subject to federal review.
What it would do is send NY real-estate and investment reeling.
Takes a rich white dude losing his toys before Republicans get concerned over the fairness of civil forfeiture. Libs have talking about civil forfeiture for years.
no no, it's more logical they he should be thrown in the gulag, all of his property be seized, completely bankrupted, and all of his children be put into a debtor's prison. But none of this is political, "trust me"Which a reasonable fine should be imposed. Actually, it should have been settled long before it got to court but the AG is playing politics.
This is coming from a guy that despises Trump- there are these things called appraisals. If banks lend millions on just a stated value then they're morons....unless the borrower is felt to be such a low risk that they just don't care what the actual values are.The fact of the matter is banks charge more for more risk. When Trump overstated the value of properties to get loans or loans at lower rates, banks took on uncompensated risk.
Correct. Let's remember that the constitution not only protects us from the feds trampling on our rights, it also protects us from states and localities from doing the same. Example: Someone wants to preach in a public, city park. The city arrests him or fines him because of some law they just passed. He can sue in federal court saying his first amendment rights are being violated.Federal Courts can most definitely review Civil Cases. The key is whether it impacts a Federal Law/Standing. The interstate commerce clauses is likely what will be applied to review it. It is so broad that it definitely covers this situation.
I guess I was asleep, got no ideawhat you are refering to a dictatorship. Just stop.
That is all you got for a dictatorship? lmaoOf course you don't you rube.
"Former Attorney General Bill Barr on Wednesday undermined a key pillar of his old boss’ defense in the special counsel’s probe into 2020 election interference, telling CNN’s Kaitlan Collins that Donald Trump “knew well he lost the election.”
The former attorney general also described Trump’s alleged actions as detailed in the indictment as “nauseating” and “despicable,” saying on “The Source,” “someone who engaged in that kind of bullying about a process that is fundamental to our system and to our self-government shouldn’t be anywhere near the Oval Office.”
That is all you got for a dictatorship? lmao