Exactly. The equation was simple. Woodson being great versus Penn State and Ohio State + Manning playing a mediocre game against Florida=The Heisman Trophy on its way to Ann Arbor.(GAVol @ Jul 8 said:I don't buy the Southern bias thing either. I think Woodson won because he had some high spots on National TV.
(GAVol @ Jul 8 said:I don't buy the Southern bias thing either. I think Woodson won because he had some high spots on National TV.
(GAVol @ Jul 8 said:I think a lot of times the Heisman is a self fulfilling prophecy. The media puts out their list at the beginning of the year and then spends the rest of the year justifying it.
When's the last time somebody came out of nowhere to win the Heisman?
I doubt may people had Jason White as their pick at the start of the '03 season. He hadn't made it through an entire season without a major injury of some sort.(GAVol @ Jul 8 said:I think a lot of times the Heisman is a self fulfilling prophecy. The media puts out their list at the beginning of the year and then spends the rest of the year justifying it.
When's the last time somebody came out of nowhere to win the Heisman?
That's about as close to a surprise winner as there has been. You can look at the past winners and tell when it was a down year for big performances. Usually those are the years when loopy armed QBs win.(hatvol96 @ Jul 8 said:I doubt may people had Jason White as their pick at the start of the '03 season. He hadn't made it through an entire season without a major injury of some sort.
(Ohio Vol @ Jul 8 said:The interesting thing is that Champ Bailey put up substantially better numbers in 1998 than Charles Woodson (including on offense) and came in 7th in Heisman voting and never was a serious candidate.
(hatvol96 @ Jul 8 said:That's strange, considering Fowler voted for Manning. All Fowler did was properly characterize the ridiculous reaction of some Tennessee fans.
There's a difference between vehemently disagreeing with the balloting and claiming a conspiracy involving ABC, ESPN, the CIA, NORAD, The Trilateral Commission, Clay Shaw, and Carlos Marcello.(GAVol @ Jul 8 said:Here we go . . . It wasn't THAT ridiculous. There were a lot of media members who thought the vote was nuts. I think it can be justified, but I think they probably got it wrong.
(hatvol96 @ Jul 8 said:There's a difference between vehemently disagreeing with the balloting and claiming a conspiracy involving ABC, ESPN, the CIA, NORAD, The Trilateral Commission, Clay Shaw, and Carlos Marcello.
(hatvol96 @ Jul 8 said:That's strange, considering Fowler voted for Manning. All Fowler did was properly characterize the ridiculous reaction of some Tennessee fans.
That's a perfectly reasonable opinion. I actually think any of four guys were deserving that year.(OrangePappy @ Jul 8 said:I'm not now or ever was particularly interested in what Fowler had to say, justified or not. I just know, and no Hat you can't change my opinion so save your breath, that Payton should have won. :twocents:
I don't know if I'd go THAT far... But the Heisman will pretty much inevitably end up in the hands of one of the 4-5 guys they mentioned at the beginning of the season. I think this same thing is practiced in lesser extent with team rankings.(kptvol @ Jul 7 said:Yeah, Reggie Bush and Matt Leinart pretty much had it sewn up before the season began.
What are you talking about? There is clearly a vast conspiracy to discredit the good name of UT football. We NEVER get good press. Ever. Especially from ESPN.(GAVol @ Jul 7 said:On that point, I agree 100%. Don't get me started on the "ESPN hates us" crowd.
I agree they're very good, even though I think age is starting to catch up with Gottfried. However, I also think the fact they like TCHFCATUTK is rather transparent.(GAVol @ Jul 8 said:IMO Franklin and Gottfried are pros. It's too bad they broke up that booth. They called games the way I wish everybody did.