rocytop2624
The 411 Guy.
- Joined
- May 1, 2011
- Messages
- 20,794
- Likes
- 25,609
The "Letter" that Stricklin wrote only said that Napier would "be our coach in the future." Rather open-ended, isn't it?
Lol, yeah, a little. I know it may seem like I’m being nitpicky, but as someone with nieces and a daughter, I wish we could let the whole using femininity as an insult thing go.Are you bored?
I hear you. I have two daughters and two sons myself. The boys and girls aren't the same and admitting that doesn't make me a feminist. The girls are definitely more dramatic, but that doesn't make them any less valuable. They have strengths of their own - such as being more creative. The jury is still out on this one, but the girls may be smarter as well.Lol, yeah, a little. I know it may seem like I’m being nitpicky, but as someone with nieces and a daughter, I wish we could let the whole using femininity as an insult thing go.
Funnily enough you were ribbing Other Guy for being a whiny pessimist. Well in my family, my brother and I are the ones who start going “Well we’re gonna lose!” as soon as we give up a first down. My sister is the only one who manages to stay even-keeled and positive.
Tennessee has had that problem in Knoxville until Danny White. Did Jeremy Foley retire as AD at Florida? He was a good one.Exactly, very intentional. And worse, the team had been playing competitive football, out comes the letter and they proceed to get clobbered by Texas. Bad look for Stricklin.
The whole outfit is a complete mess right now. Lame duck President, lame duck AD, lame duck head coach.
I think the Stricklin letter supporting Napier is irrelevant and non-binding. I think it was done to try and assist with recruiting (it won’t).
I think after Napier loses two of the last three (LSU, Ole Miss, FSU), if not all of the last 3, he’ll be fired.