KnoxRealtorVOL
First of his name
- Joined
- Jan 26, 2010
- Messages
- 18,087
- Likes
- 32,158
I still contend that Tyson was a good brawler and power hitter, but as far as boxing skill there are many that were better, even in his prime. He won on intimidation and landing one punch. JMO, but there is a difference between boxing and fighting.
Saul: "A man has the right to change his name to vat ever he vants to change it to. And if a man vants to be called Muhammad Ali, *^%##%^ this is a free country, you should respect his vishes, and call the man Muhammad Ali. Morris: His mamma call him Clay, imma call him Clay. Saul: Then you're a putz. All of you are putzes. They should change the sign outside from My-T-Sharp to 'ze Three Putzes".
Speed/power combo unmatched imo.
What boxer would have beat him? prime to prime?
He would have made Ali his bithc!
I agree. He certainly wasn't a finesse boxer. However, if we apply this argument, you would have to leave "physical freakishness" out of the "athlete" or "best of a sport" conversation to only compare players on "skill". That would eliminate a lot of amazing athletes over a lot of sports.
Ever heard of Earnie Shavers? Ali took his shots and he was quite possibly the hardest puncher ever. Marciano, Lewis and Shavers were harder punchers than Tyson.
I still contend that Tyson was a good brawler and power hitter, but as far as boxing skill there are many that were better, even in his prime. He won on intimidation and landing one punch. JMO, but there is a difference between boxing and fighting.