who voted these morons in?
It's like blaming the retard for burning the house down when someone let the retard play with fire.
I'm assuming he is referring to Anti-Semitism.
I remember when I was in high school, we used to vodka in our mouth. :unsure:
I read this the other day and I think if you couple it with the amount of Social Security and Medicare liabilities coming up, and the general inability of politicians or people in general to look out for their long term interests, the future is looking, economically fairly grim. The only positive I can find is that America is still pretty awesome and we are almost too big to fail.
I agree with a lot of what the article said. But does anyone honestly see the govt seriously addressing, not to mention fixing, our debt issue over the next 10 years?
I certainly don't. Obama has already proven he in't concerned. No one seems interested in doing anything about it. Each side seems content with blaming the other.
It makes me somewhat upset. I certainly admit I'm young, and I've been wrong many a times before. But I don't see this ending well. In fact, I'm scared to think about what we might be dealing with in 15 years when I'm trying to raise a family and we are faced with massive inflation amongst other problems.
We need political change, but it's actually getting worse. How is this possible, who's responsible for making sure everything goes right to the point to where every candidate is a complete piece of ****. It's really the perfect storm.
That's why 23.9 hours of the day I choose to ignore it.
Serious about the first part, actually. The OWS might hate corporate America for profiteering or blocking the public option or other stupid stuff like that, but it's also the same force that keeps things like competitive market reform and meaningful tax reform from happening.
That problem is never going to go away as long as we have corporations and an over-reaching government. Since we don't want to make corporations go away, the issue is with over-reaching government, IMO.
It's a symbiotic relationship, dude. I don't believe government just grows for its own sake, I think if you look closely enough at nearly every government overreach, there is a vested non-government entity of some sort (individual, corporation or group of corporations) pulling the strings.
Politicians then become vested in going along with whatever those interests might because one has to sell out to become a politician in the first place through private campaign finance, then sell out again as a legislator through spending 60% of the time of any legislative session only having lucrative conversations (lobbyists), then getting a cushy seven or eight figure salary with a group for whom they've spent their whole political career tilting the field one way or another in their favor.
You think the size of government is far too big, that's fine. I'm telling you that you will never, in your lifetime, see the size of government reduced meaningfully and specifically in a way to create freer markets, just by voting in such and such politician. Anyone who can ever get in a position to create some sort of meaningful change is going to be bought off by that point.
Yes, I realize that unlimited private campaign finance and unlimited lobbying might truly be the freest forms of speech, but this burdensome government with all its tax and market distortions is the price.