Greeneville decision coming soon?

#2
#2
I don't have any info... but I speculate the slow response is due to giving the NCAA some time to implement new "guidance" as the injunction decision will go the way of Tennessee and Virginia. If it were going the way of the NCAA the extended pause doesn't make SENSE, to me.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: feathersax, CedarHillVol and Woodlawn VOL
#3
#3
ankh83 said:
I don't have any info... but I speculate the slow response is due to giving the NCAA some time to implement new "guidance" as the injunction decision will go the way of Tennessee and Virginia. If it were going the way of the NCAA the extended pause doesn't make since, to me.
Click to expand...
Certainly hope you are correct. Still seems like it’s taking quite a while.
 
#4
#4
ankh83 said:
I don't have any info... but I speculate the slow response is due to giving the NCAA some time to implement new "guidance" as the injunction decision will go the way of Tennessee and Virginia. If it were going the way of the NCAA the extended pause doesn't make since, to me.
Click to expand...
8 days is not long at all for a Court to chew on a decision/write an opinion. I wouldn't read anything into it.

I had a hearing last Wednesday that the Court granted the relief I requested in open court, I sent him written orders the same day and the judge just signed them today (and that's with me drafting them, not him, lol) and that took 6 days.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Gandalf, kcvols1, feathersax and 18 others
#8
#8
unfrozencvmanvol said:
8 days is not long at all for a Court to chew on a decision/write an opinion. I wouldn't read anything into it.

I had a hearing last Wednesday that the Court granted the relief I requested in open court, I sent him written orders the same day and the judge just signed them today (and that's with me drafting them, not him, lol) and that took 6 days.
Click to expand...
What's your prediction, being in the field and all?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Smokey19rt
#9
#9
I hope the judge lets it ride out until after this football season. Spring practice starts very soon. No need to shake and rattle the upcoming season or negatively effect a students ability to earn a living or participate
 
  • Like
Reactions: CragrockVol
#10
#10
ankh83 said:
I don't have any info... but I speculate the slow response is due to giving the NCAA some time to implement new "guidance" as the injunction decision will go the way of Tennessee and Virginia. If it were going the way of the NCAA the extended pause doesn't make since, to me.
Click to expand...
Since has never made sense to me.
 
  • Like
Reactions: VolDave53, ankh83, 65YearsAVol and 3 others
#13
#13
DonDiego said:
What's your prediction, being in the field and all?
Click to expand...
I'm not an anti-trust lawyer, but my understanding is that we have a strong case. That said, I really wouldn't be surprised either way (if the injunction was or wasn't granted). He seems to have already signaled that he considered us likely to prevail at a trial on the merits, but the judge may let discovery play out without essentially suspending the NCAA's ability to enforce it's rules and breaking CFB with the stroke of his pen, at least not until after he has heard all of the evidence.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: gomovol, kcvols1 and esarmstrong
#14
#14
madbamahater said:
I hope the judge lets it ride out until after this football season. Spring practice starts very soon. No need to shake and rattle the upcoming season or negatively effect a students ability to earn a living or participate
Click to expand...
But doesn’t that hurt us in recruiting with other teams saying we are “under NCAA investigation“?
 
#17
#17
unfrozencvmanvol said:
I'm not an anti-trust lawyer, but my understanding is that we have a strong case. That said, I really wouldn't be surprised either way (if the injunction was or wasn't granted). He seems to have already signaled that he considered us likely to prevail on a trial on the merits, but the judge may let discovery play out without essentially suspending the NCAA's ability to enforce it's rules and breaking CFB with the stroke of his pen, at least not until after he has heard all of the evidence.
Click to expand...
People need to remember that a ruling on the injunction is not a final ruling on the merits. Quit worrying folks.
 
  • Like
Reactions: VolDave53, Remy, davethevol and 3 others
#20
#20
Clifton L. Corker

Judge of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee
Incumbent
Assumed office
July 22, 2019
Appointed by Donald Trump
Preceded by J. Ronnie Greer
Magistrate Judge of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee
In office
May 1, 2015 – July 22, 2019
Personal details
Born 1967 (age 56–57)
Richmond, Virginia, U.S.
Education James Madison University (BBA)
College of William & Mary (JD)
 
#22
#22
Vfl2407 said:
But doesn’t that hurt us in recruiting with other teams saying we are “under NCAA investigation“?
Click to expand...
I think it would, because you know that other schools will sure bring it up. I think we will win the case in the end, don't know if we will win this one or not based on what I have read from lawyers on here, it's like we have a good case but may have to appeal to win, and that all takes time.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top