tigervol9802
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 1, 2009
- Messages
- 10,404
- Likes
- 6
Definitely going to be an interesting hour tomorrow night. Harvard has essentially Richmond's profile, but with no Top 25 wins and less losses to 101+ opponents. Plus, higher SOS and RPI.
Seeds 13-16 is for automatic qualifiers only.
I'm pretty sure the massive expose the New York Times did spelled it out in terms even you could understand.
I'm assuming that you do realize that I'm referring to Harvard, not Princeton. If Harvard is lucky enough to slide into the tournament at all, then I don't see them getting a seed any higher than a 15 seed, and it would likely be a 16 seed.
Is that an actual hard rule, or is that just the way that it always plays out in practice? I've never heard of any rule to that effect.
The fact of the matter is that I think that Harvard has next to zero chance of getting into the tournament. However, if they did, then they would be an extremely low seed, and I don't think there is a hard rule seeding only automatic qualifiers 13-16.
Instead of hiding behind the grey lady's opinion, I did some research of my own.. the findings:
Harvard has 6 players committed in this years recruiting class. 4 of the 6 have offers from at least 1 other Ivy League school, and 1 of the remaining 2 has an offer from Stanford. The other player is not even rated by rivals and only has one other offer altogether so its not like hes trying to sneak some great player by bending academic rules.
Yea he's really recruiting a bunch of idiots.
You fail, per usual
another gem, you bring so much to the board bpv. not sure what we'd do without you.
Air Force and Bradley are the only two teams to ever get an at large below 12. They were both 13's. It's extremely rare.
I think it's only used when a scheduling conflict or matchup problem occurs.
Once again, you have no frigging idea what you're talking about.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
How is he breaking the ivy code if he is offering the same players the other teams in the league are offering?
And in response to your other post, I have no desire to get into a pissing match of message board popularity with you, I simply will reiterate the point that you bring very little tangible matter to the board (outside of the Civil War discussion in the off topic forum which I enjoyed reading).
That wouldn't have anything to do with the Ivy presidents having called a special meeting to rip Harvard after his first two recruiting classes, would it? Keep making a fool of yourself. It's what you do best. You've made commenting on subjects you don't know the first damn thing about an art form.Instead of hiding behind the grey lady's opinion, I did some research of my own.. the findings:
Harvard has 6 players committed in this years recruiting class. 4 of the 6 have offers from at least 1 other Ivy League school, and 1 of the remaining 2 has an offer from Stanford. The other player is not even rated by rivals and only has one other offer altogether so its not like hes trying to sneak some great player by bending academic rules.
Yea he's really recruiting a bunch of idiots.
You fail, per usual
How is he breaking the ivy code if he is offering the same players the other teams in the league are offering?
And in response to your other post, I have no desire to get into a pissing match of message board popularity with you, I simply will reiterate the point that you bring very little tangible matter to the board (outside of the Civil War discussion in the off topic forum which I enjoyed reading).
Read more, post much much less.
I'll assure you that I'm very unpopular here because I'm happy to tell stupid people that they're, well, stupid. See, acting as if the dumbass little post you made abort rivals rankings and who's offered what in the rising class makes you, well, stupid.
Posted via VolNation Mobile