Healthcare Worker vaccine was terrible decision

#51
#51
kiddiedoc said:
You're so clueless. If I were a liberal, I would be embarrassed that people like you actually share your thoughts publicly, because it makes you all look like a bunch of condescending trolls unable to engage in critical thinking or intelligent conversation.

I actually take my ball to the office and hospital every day and take care of COVID patients. Keep telling me that you're right, though. Maybe next time we can all avoid hospitalization, unlike the last time when we drank Powerade and played Xbox for a few days.
Click to expand...
Better watch out or she going to shoot you down with another opinion piece.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NorthDallas40
#52
#52
My vaccinated nurse and her husband are both positive now. Fairly sick with bad sore throat, headache, and fever.
 
#54
#54
kiddiedoc said:
You're so clueless. If I were a liberal, I would be embarrassed that people like you actually share your thoughts publicly, because it makes you all look like a bunch of condescending trolls unable to engage in critical thinking or intelligent conversation.

I actually take my ball to the office and hospital every day and take care of COVID patients. Keep telling me that you're right, though. Maybe next time we can all avoid hospitalization, unlike the last time when we drank Powerade and played Xbox for a few days.
Click to expand...

Nice dodge. But the question is a simple one: What's better, hybrid immunity or covid-based immunity? You know what the data says. Just admit it.

More immunity--which the vaccine is going to provide, regardless of whether or not you've been previously infected-- means less likelihood of infection, less severe infection if it does occur, quicker recovery time if infected, lower chance of infecting others, and less chance of hospitalizations. Hmmm, now if I were to draw up an ideal medical staff, would I want them with those qualities, or would I prefer them to have less immunity?
 
#55
#55
evillawyer said:
Posted the article from Nature. But I know, it's just some MSM, liberal rag, right?
Click to expand...
And I replied. The author isn’t a scientist and the article even stated they couldn’t reconcile the claim. So about that chickenpox guidance you got any idea when I can expect an update from CDC since you’re an insider? 🤣🤡🤣🤡
 
#56
#56
evillawyer said:
Nice dodge. But the question is a simple one: What's better, hybrid immunity or covid-based immunity? You know what the data says. Just admit it.

More immunity--which the vaccine is going to provide, regardless of whether or not you've been previously infected-- means less likelihood of infection, less severe infection if it does occur, quicker recovery time if infected, lower chance of infecting others, and less chance of hospitalizations. Hmmm, now if I were to draw up an ideal medical staff, would I want them with those qualities, or would I prefer them to have less immunity?
Click to expand...
Your op-Ed doesn’t support your claim cat turd 🤡
 
  • Like
Reactions: allvol123
#57
#57
evillawyer said:
Nice dodge. But the question is a simple one: What's better, hybrid immunity or covid-based immunity? You know what the data says. Just admit it.

More immunity--which the vaccine is going to provide, regardless of whether or not you've been previously infected-- means less likelihood of infection, less severe infection if it does occur, quicker recovery time if infected, lower chance of infecting others, and less chance of hospitalizations. Hmmm, now if I were to draw up an ideal medical staff, would I want them with those qualities, or would I prefer them to have less immunity?
Click to expand...
A vax which targets a spike protein that isn’t even closely related to the current strain has shown to be useless. But get the jab anyway! The clear take away from your op-Ed is prior infection is the key basis for a significant response to further exposure. The rest of it is “we have no real clue but here’s our best guess…” 🤡
 
#59
#59
evillawyer said:
You didn't read it, did you?
Click to expand...
Oh I read it look just above your reply. You’re a clueless shill cat turd 🤡

The op-Ed opens with this ground breaking lede

People who have previously recovered from COVID-19 have a stronger immune response after being vaccinated than those who have never been infected. Scientists are trying to find out why.
Click to expand...

So about that updated chickenpox vac guidance? 🤡🤡🤡
 
#61
#61
NorthDallas40 said:
Oh I read it look just above your reply. You’re a clueless shill cat turd 🤡

The op-Ed opens with this ground breaking lede



So about that updated chickenpox vac guidance? 🤡🤡🤡
Click to expand...

What calls out for explanation is WHY the infected + vaxxed people have a stronger immune response than those who are only vaxxed, not THAT they have such a response. That they have such an immune response is not in question. It's the given.

Like I said, back to the kiddie table for you.
 
#62
#62
kiddiedoc said:
I can assure you guys that whoever came up with a ridiculous number like "1%" is either intentionally fabricating data, didn't conduct an actual study, or has already included all the filed exemptions. I'm not going to debate it, but trust me. Our local hospitals alone stand to lose a number of the best specialist physicians, nurses, and ancillary staff that we have.
Click to expand...
I have a family member that works in the medical field for a large Hospital and I can tell you for a fact that about 1/3 of her co-workers are unvax and most of those said they will stay that way(per my conversation with her). Besides, the government might dictate a vax mandate but each individual business can set its own "exceptions" guidelines. Where my family member works, if an employee applied for an exemption and it was approved (from my understanding). So these business that are "not approving" exemptions, are doing so on their own accord and with no guideline. Now with the mandate allowed for healthcare workers, a hospital can lose employees to competitors simply on how they handle exemptions. This adds an entirely new dynamic to the workplace. Just my 2 cents
 
#63
#63
NorthDallas40 said:
Oh snap my op-Ed reply to your op-Ed. Your turn cat turd. 🤡🤡🤡

Not so super-immunity: People who’ve recovered from COVID-19 and vaccinated can still be reinfected
Click to expand...

That readin' thang is hard

From your article:

"Even so, the infection rate among those with hybrid immunity was around seven times lower, six to eight months post-vaccination, compared to those who had received only two vaccine doses. Unvaccinated individuals who had recovered from COVID-19 but were not vaccinated after that were around three times as likely to be reinfected compared to those with hybrid immunity.'

Again, for the love of God, go back to the kiddie table and let the adults discuss this.
 
#64
#64
evillawyer said:
What calls out for explanation is WHY the infected + vaxxed people have a stronger immune response than those who are only vaxxed, not THAT they have such a response. That they have such an immune response is not in question. It's the given.

Like I said, back to the kiddie table for you.
Click to expand...
“The study which has not yet been peer reviewed…”

If it saves just one life…🤡🤡🤡

Out in the alley with you to search for more cats, cat turd
 
#65
#65
evillawyer said:
Even with a prior covid illness, you'd be better protected with a vaccine than without. Those with higher degrees of protection--however it is obtained--are less likely to get infected in the first place, and if they do get infected, they are much more likely to have a mild case that does not require hospitalization. Seems like we would want our healthcare workers to be as protected as they can be. But nah, take your ball home and pout and show us how much you love freedumb.
Click to expand...
You're trying to actually argue an actual Dr, like you know more about this than him? Where'd you get your medical degree Karen?🤣🤣
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rasputin_Vol, FLVOL69 and NorthDallas40
#66
#66
evillawyer said:
That readin' thang is hard

From your article:

"Even so, the infection rate among those with hybrid immunity was around seven times lower, six to eight months post-vaccination, compared to those who had received only two vaccine doses. Unvaccinated individuals who had recovered from COVID-19 but were not vaccinated after that were around three times as likely to be reinfected compared to those with hybrid immunity.'

Again, for the love of God, go back to the kiddie table and let the adults discuss this.
Click to expand...
“The study which has not been peer reviewed…”

If it saves one life!!!

The key is prior infection. The rest is a PR campaign to push the jab. That’s clear.
 
  • Like
Reactions: joevol33 and FLVOL69
#67
#67
evillawyer said:
Let's wait for the good doctor to respond. He knows full well that those with hybrid immunity (recovered from covid and vaxxed) have greater immune protection.
Click to expand...

If you've had Covid and also have been vaxxed doesn't that prove the shots do not work? The unfortunate ones who stuck their arm out for an experimental gene therapy drug are going to pay the ultimate price ie no immune system.A true vaccine prevents infection it doesn't lessen the symptoms 😆 How many boosters have you had for polio, measles and smallpox?
 
  • Like
Reactions: UT_Dutchman, joevol33 and NorthDallas40
#68
#68
evillawyer said:
You know, maybe folks could also just get their dumbasses vaxxed and not tax the system the way we're currently doing it. But nah, let's blame Biden. We don't wanna do nutin' ourselves to curb this virus, but we do wanna beotch that Biden hasn't done anything to fix things. Like a horse demanding water when he's standing in front of a lake.
Click to expand...
Here is your entry into the fray cat turd. Based on your current premise of what is key to the discussion can you now extrapolate how those with prior infection are “taxing the system”? You should probably present your reply from over at the kiddie table 🤣🤡🤣🤡
 
#69
#69
FLVOL69 said:
If you've had Covid and also have been vaxxed doesn't that prove the shots do not work? The unfortunate ones who stuck their arm out for an experimental gene therapy drug are going to pay the ultimate price ie no immune system.A true vaccine prevents infection it doesn't lessen the symptoms 😆 How many boosters have you had for polio, measles and smallpox?
Click to expand...

Dear lord. There's this thing, it's called google, you can search up all sorts of data on the effectiveness of vaccines. No vaccine is 100% effective.

Polio Vaccine Effectiveness and Duration of Protection | CDC

Measles, Mumps, and Rubella (MMR) Vaccination | CDC

Vaccine Basics | Smallpox | CDC
 
#70
#70
  • Like
Reactions: joevol33
#71
#71
evillawyer said:
Dear lord. There's this thing, it's called google, you can search up all sorts of data on the effectiveness of vaccines. No vaccine is 100% effective.

Polio Vaccine Effectiveness and Duration of Protection | CDC

Measles, Mumps, and Rubella (MMR) Vaccination | CDC

Vaccine Basics | Smallpox | CDC
Click to expand...
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!! 🤣🤡😂🤡

Adults
Adults who do not have presumptive evidence of immunityshould get at least one dose of MMR vaccine.

Certain adults may need 2 doses. Adults who are going to be in a setting that poses a high risk for measles or mumps transmission should make sure they have had two doses separated by at least 28 days. These adults include


Evidence of immunity
Acceptable presumptive evidence of immunity against measles includes at least one of the following:

  • written documentation of adequate vaccination:
    • one or more doses of a measles-containing vaccine administered on or after the first birthday for preschool-age children and adults not at high risk
    • two doses of measles-containing vaccine for school-age children and adults at high risk, including college students, healthcare personnel, and international travelers
  • laboratory evidence of immunity*
  • laboratory confirmation of measles
  • birth before 1957
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top