DiderotsGhost
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Nov 28, 2011
- Messages
- 4,618
- Likes
- 23,453
Wow. It's not just Tennessee that got screwed. It legitimately looks like the selection committee did not watch a single game in the past month.
Duke (NET rank of #13) at 2?
Wisconsin (NET rank of #24) at 3?
Auburn (NET rank of #12) at 2?
Virginia Tech wins the ACC and has a NET rank of #27 (implying a 7 seed), but instead gets picked as an 11 and likely misses the tournament if they don't win the ACC tourney?
Notre Dame (NET rank of #53) and Wyoming (NET rank of #50) get in over Texas A&M (NET rank of #42)? This is even worse than it seems once you go outside the NET rankings and look at other reliable computer pollsters. Sagarin has Wyoming as #83 and Notre Dame as #54. And neither team had a compelling late season run to justify it like Texas A&M.
Rutgers gets in with one of the weakest tournament profiles I've ever seen: NET rank of #77, 4-10 away-from-home record, and 18-13 overall record?
Might as well have stopped playing on January 31st. Doesn't appear that the committee factored in anything that happened after that point into their selections (except if it benefits the Holy Big 10). This goes directly against their own stated criteria.
Hoping our Vols play with a chip on their shoulder in the tournament. They put us below at least 4 teams we should have been above. They seriously put Duke and Wisconsin above us. Complete joke!
Duke (NET rank of #13) at 2?
Wisconsin (NET rank of #24) at 3?
Auburn (NET rank of #12) at 2?
Virginia Tech wins the ACC and has a NET rank of #27 (implying a 7 seed), but instead gets picked as an 11 and likely misses the tournament if they don't win the ACC tourney?
Notre Dame (NET rank of #53) and Wyoming (NET rank of #50) get in over Texas A&M (NET rank of #42)? This is even worse than it seems once you go outside the NET rankings and look at other reliable computer pollsters. Sagarin has Wyoming as #83 and Notre Dame as #54. And neither team had a compelling late season run to justify it like Texas A&M.
Rutgers gets in with one of the weakest tournament profiles I've ever seen: NET rank of #77, 4-10 away-from-home record, and 18-13 overall record?
Might as well have stopped playing on January 31st. Doesn't appear that the committee factored in anything that happened after that point into their selections (except if it benefits the Holy Big 10). This goes directly against their own stated criteria.
Hoping our Vols play with a chip on their shoulder in the tournament. They put us below at least 4 teams we should have been above. They seriously put Duke and Wisconsin above us. Complete joke!