HUH, What?? You mean Holly's not the first coach of the team? I thought LV basketball just started this season; MIND BLOWN! I will have to google on this. Just give me a second: "Did the LV basketball program exist before the 2015-2016 season? Hmmm, a lot of links are popping up. Well I'll be....
But I do know some folks that were alive way back in the day when the LVs played in the AIAW and could never quite get over the hump against Cheryl Miller and USC (I thought those stories were like, you know ancient Greek myths; Cheryl Miller, Zeus and so on). I guess not...
And those people tell me that times change; there is more parity in women's basketball and that it is not healthy to live in the past. They also acknowledge that LVs have clearly dropped a notch from the program's heyday as evinced by the final four drought and the struggles of this season. And they point out that Holly actually inherited a program that had already dropped a level. Is she the coach to bring them back up to elite status? My more experienced confidants tell me that there is a good reason to have doubts about this. But they also note she is the head coach and that her status is not likely to change in the future. So, it does not hurt to at take some pleasures when positive glimmers appear. In the end, there is not much difference between wishing that Holly gets fired or that she grows into the job. Both positions recognize that things on the coaching side need to improve.
But, if someone says only firing Holly will do, that entrenchment suggest that it is more about personality than results.
And last but not least, my experienced informants say that if someone can't take any pleasure from a conference win or the LV's very recent SEC co-championship or the moments of brilliance that these players sometimes display, then you really should find something else to do.
Okay, I am going to read up on who this Pat Summitt person is.