Homosexuals are not suitable to serve in the military.

#252
#252
I think anyone who is willing to fight for the country should be able to. However, the army should know what would work best for it, and it should be their decision.
 
#254
#254
tvolsfan said:
I think anyone who is willing to fight for the country should be able to. However, the army should know what would work best for it, and it should be their decision.
Click to expand...

I was a squad leader in Heavy Cavalry units, and i agree.
I don't think any "queer eye for the straight guy" queens would ever volunteer, and should someone be gay, whatever. Don't broadcast it, live and let live.
 
#255
#255
JTrainDavis said:
I was a squad leader in Heavy Cavalry units, and i agree.
I don't think any "queer eye for the straight guy" queens would ever volunteer, and should someone be gay, whatever. Don't broadcast it, live and let live.
Click to expand...

Well said.
 
#256
#256
JTrainDavis said:
I was a squad leader in Heavy Cavalry units, and i agree.
I don't think any "queer eye for the straight guy" queens would ever volunteer, and should someone be gay, whatever. Don't broadcast it, live and let live.
Click to expand...

Exactly. The don't ask don't tell policy is a reasonable solution. I understand that some want to be open about their sexuality and can understand that gripe, but the military just has no place for it.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
#257
#257
Do you know any that might be able to play quarterback this year? We won't ask or tell...
 
#258
#258
BigPapaVol said:
Exactly. The don't ask don't tell policy is a reasonable solution. I understand that some want to be open about their sexuality and can understand that gripe, but the military just has no place for it.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
Click to expand...

Exactly is right.

Polling by Military Times -

of its active-duty subscribers over the past four years indicates that 58 percent have consistently opposed repeal. In its most recent survey, 10 percent said they would not re-enlist if that happened, and 14 percent said they would consider leaving.
........

And the damage would not stop there. Legislation introduced to repeal Section 654 (H.R. 1283) would impose on commanders a radical policy that mandates "nondiscrimination" against "homosexuality, or bisexuality, whether the orientation is real or perceived." Mandatory training classes and judicial proceedings would consume valuable time defining that language. Team cohesion and concentration on missions would suffer if our troops had to live in close quarters with others who could be sexually attracted to them.

We don't need a study commission to know that tensions are inevitable in conditions offering little or no privacy, increasing the stress of daily military life. "Zero tolerance" of dissent would become official intolerance of anyone who disagrees with this policy, forcing additional thousands to leave the service by denying them promotions or punishing them in other ways. Many more will be dissuaded from ever enlisting. There is no compelling national security reason for running these risks to our armed forces. Discharges for homosexual conduct have been few compared with separations for other reasons,
Click to expand...
 
#259
#259
Ok, I went through and read some of the opinions, now here's my 2 cents. If it ain't broke..don't fix it. The military has done just fine with the "don't ask, don't tell" policy. There are gays in the military as we speak. Unless your living under a rock you already know this. Who a individual has sex with dosen't concern me. What does concern me is the government saying its ok to be open about homosexuality. Allow me to preach on it.

There are schools/training that we do in the military to advance our careers. Your basically living with these dudes for weeks/months at a time. Alot of the ones I've attended have open showers. Just imagine a dude checking you out in the shower just feet away from you. Then when your done you have to go back to the hut and sleep next to this guy who's is gay, was just checking you out and now he wants to know where your from.

I'm not a homo phobe. I got over that a long time ago. I knew a guy that wore perfume to work. He was the give'e not the give'r, if you get my drift. The point is, there will be serious problems if the government gets stupid.
 
#260
#260
Good writeup 7th, I think the current policy is effective, I don't feel gay grandstanding would be good for unit cohesion and therfore a detriment to combat effectiveness.
 
#261
#261
JTrainDavis said:
Good writeup 7th, I think the current policy is effective, I don't feel gay grandstanding would be good for unit cohesion and therfore a detriment to combat effectiveness.
Click to expand...

This is my take as well. If you want to serve and happen to be gay don't advertise your sexual preferences and all will be well.
 
#264
#264
From what one of my guy's told me, he is an E-6 in the Ohio National Guard, guys and gals can buy man pieces that suction to the wall of the shower.
 
#266
#266
I'm all for homosexuals fighting for their country. But, I see no need to condone this kind of behavior as if there is nothing wrong with it.
 
#268
#268
Wasn't it Larry the Cable guy or something that said the three divisions of the army should consist of PMS-ing women and homosexuals. Send in the PMS women to kick ass and kill everyone. Then send the homosexuals in to clean up and hang curtains over everything.
 
#270
#270
dantheman617 said:
Wasn't it Larry the Cable guy or something that said the three divisions of the army should consist of PMS-ing women and homosexuals. Send in the PMS women to kick ass and kill everyone. Then send the homosexuals in to clean up and hang curtains over everything.
Click to expand...

For president!!!!!

549972.jpg


For Vice president!!!!

444349.jpg


All you'll ever need to cover both domestic and foreign policy! :)
 
#272
#272
What do you mean, "has" become? I think human stupidity is one of only a few universal constants.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top