No no no! At your funeral, they will say "here lies Yankee, a loving father, strong American, supporter of Kyle Busch, and debtor."
Your family will weep at the shame of knowing that you had ever taken on debt on a depreciating asset. How selfish of you Yankee.
What's the difference between paying now, and a 0% loan? I think I'm being fiscally responsible by managing my future cash flows rather than having a significant one time expense.
The difference is that by using their money, you don't tie up a wad of your own cash in an investment that you can't hope to get a return from other than some utility.
It's not for everybody but personally, I've never understood the glory in paying cash for a rapidly depreciating piece of machinery. I enjoy using other people's money for close to free.
What's it about? You are going to pay a whole bunch of money on an asset that depreciates in value quickly. If I can use that cash to make a positive return I'm going to do it every time
Often when paying cash you can negotiate a much lower price for a vehicle. You have to figure that on your return on investment calculations. Also you need to make sure you have the disciple not to spend the money you are planning on investing on something else.
Often when paying cash you can negotiate a much lower price for a vehicle. You have to figure that on your return on investment calculations. Also you need to make sure you have the disciple not to spend the money you are planning on investing on something else.
Here I go again ... With money being free or nearly free, does it really matter what you do with the money as long as you can cash flow the payment without being on the edge of going broke?
I had a dealer turn down an offer the other day that shocked me. I offered to pay exactly what was on the sticker. I asked them to take care of the taxes for me and i would write them a check right then. They declined. I was shocked. Not only that, this will be the third time the dealer has sold the truck. The truck sold new there and the first two owners traded back in there. Im still surprised.
Nerd, does it make a huge difference between haggling on phone or in person. Like if someone made a reasonable offer over the phone that was declined by the sales manager, would actually going there and making the same offer make a difference?
price negotiation in person is the way we do things at my dealership. What any dealer wants to see is that they have a committed buyer. I personally try to avoid talking about price over the phone. Why? You will simply take my number and go to my competitor and aske them to beat it. You can't sell a car over the phone. That said, a lot of high volume lots will negotiate over the phone.
You also have to consider if your offer is reasonable, see what kbb, nada, and edmunds have to say. Depending on the price of the vehicle, the tax could be $2500. Not every used car on the lot has $2500-4000 of mark up. You have to remember, that a certain point, if the vehicle has been on the lot a while the dealer will discount it to where they will break even. Just because the vehicle has been on the lot a long time does not mean the dealer is going to take more of a loss than they would at the auction house.
Also, the whole writing a check or paying cash to get a deal done does not work.
As a buyer I disagree. I don't have time for all the bs so if I can't get the deal done over email and phone I'll go elsewhere.
I absolutely understand. If you are dealing with a vehicle that is readily available then by all means go about negotiate over the phone. You don't want to waste your time.
That said a deal is more likely to happen, on your terms if you are there in person.
out of curiosity, have you sold a home before? Either yourself or with a realtor?
Yes I have with a realtor.
Cool, I never have sold a house myself, so let me know if what I'm saying isn't so.
I imagine the two goals you need your realtor to achieve are get the house sold in a timely fashion, and as close to the asking price as possible.
Wouldn't you as the seller be a bit irked if you found that your realtor was simply giving out the very minimum you would sell for to every person who called up? Wouldn't you prefer that your realtor entertain reasonable offers from serious buyers, as opposed to hitting the number of a person you may never see?
I know I don't come from the side that garners any sympathy or trustworthyness, but hopefully that illustrates my position a little bit.
Please let me know if the analogy does not work