House Oversight Committee- Biden family money laundering & foreign shakedown thread

#626
#626
whodeycin85 said:
Yes but if I'm allowed to have unfettered access to my illegally gotten gains.. all one had to do is get rid of everything or launder it as SPCvol said
Click to expand...

That's not how it works. Plus until conviction it isn't proven to be ill-gotten gains.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Vol8188
#627
#627
whodeycin85 said:
But if the record shows no money in the account now it's a he said she said situation.... No body no murder, no weapon, no murder... No money no ill gotten gains
Click to expand...

No, it's not a he-said/she-said situation. There would be multiple records of that money being deposited.
 
#629
#629
hog88 said:
No, it's not a he-said/she-said situation. There would be multiple records of that money being deposited.
Click to expand...
It would be a hard time proving a person gained millions of dollars when there isn't millions of dollars sitting in an account. You have records of deposits, but if there is no further records them that's a tough road to prove
 
  • Like
Reactions: SpaceCoastVol
#631
#631
whodeycin85 said:
It would be a hard time proving a person gained millions of dollars when there isn't millions of dollars sitting in an account. You have records of deposits, but if there is no further records them that's a tough road to prove
Click to expand...

WUT? There would be numerous records of deposit and withdrawals from every institution that handled that money.
 
#633
#633
hog88 said:
So what? The paper trail remains.
Click to expand...
You unknowingly might have answered your own question.
The Court issues a warrant based on information provided.
The evidence, as described in the warrant must remain in place to be valid in court. The monies contained in the account must be perserved(frozen)
 
#634
#634
Caculator said:
You unknowingly might have answered your own question.
The Court issues a warrant based on information provided.
The evidence, as described in the warrant must remain in place to be valid in court. The monies contained in the account must be perserved(frozen)
Click to expand...

You do know that there is no actual money in your bank account don't you?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Vol8188
#636
#636
hog88 said:
No, it's not a he-said/she-said situation. There would be multiple records of that money being deposited.
Click to expand...
Until said funds disappear into a black hole or mysteriously burn in a boating accident. Look at what the Bidens are doing for crying out loud.
 
#637
#637
SpaceCoastVol said:
Until said funds disappear into a black hole or mysteriously burn in a boating accident. Look at what the Bidens are doing for crying out loud.
Click to expand...

The records are there, it's a lack of people willing to look for them that's the problem.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Vol8188
#639
#639
hog88 said:
You do know that there is no actual money in your bank account don't you?
Click to expand...
Yeah I know, I'm broke.
A distinction without a difference. The freeze keeps the defendant from accessing the funds, no matter the location of them.
 
#640
#640
Caculator said:
Yeah I know, I'm broke.
A distinction without a difference. The freeze keeps the defendant from accessing the funds, no matter the location of them.
Click to expand...

Defendant? You suggested that the Bidens bank accounts be frozen, only 1 is a defendant, you also advocated that freezing bank accounts is needed for investigations. That would mean you support freezing them on people who are not yet defendants.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Vol8188
#641
#641
hog88 said:
Defendant? You suggested that the Bidens bank accounts be frozen, only 1 is a defendant, you also advocated that freezing bank accounts is needed for investigations. That would mean you support freezing them on people who are not yet defendants.
Click to expand...
That is absurd. If you recieved illicit funds like the big guy, his son, his brother, his grand daughter then they are defendants. The context has always been defendants, you know that.
 
#642
#642
Caculator said:
That is absurd. If you recieved illicit funds like the big guy, his son, his brother, his grand daughter then they are defendants. The context has always been defendants, you know that.
Click to expand...

Nobody is a defendant until they are charged.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Vol8188
#644
#644
whodeycin85 said:
Nothing get seized before charges are brought..your originally said until found guilty
Click to expand...

They freeze/seize assets all the time without a person being charged. Sometimes the person is never charged and has to fight in the courts to get their assets back.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Vol8188
#645
#645
hog88 said:
Nobody is a defendant until they are charged.
Click to expand...
hog88
hog88
Your ray of sunshine
JoinedSep 30, 2008
Messages101,656
Likes128,803
Caculator said:
The IRS should freeze every Bidens' bank account immediately
No, they haven't been convicted.
Like Quote ReplyReport
 
#646
#646
hog88 said:
They freeze/seize assets all the time without a person being charged. Sometimes the person is never charged and has to fight in the courts to get their assets back.
Click to expand...
Then that is wrong imo...I thought we were arguing while charging and investigation was happening..
 
#647
#647
Caculator said:
hog88
hog88
Your ray of sunshine
JoinedSep 30, 2008
Messages101,656
Likes128,803
Caculator said:
The IRS should freeze every Bidens' bank account immediately
No, they haven't been convicted.
Like Quote ReplyReport
Click to expand...

WTH?
 
#648
#648
Funky quote of you saying convicted at the beginning and attempted moving the goal posts to Haven't been convicted
 
#650
#650
I'll let you decide how much difference not convicted is as opposed to convicted in a court of law
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top