House Oversight Committee- Biden family money laundering & foreign shakedown thread

#51
#51
Might want to revisit what Obama said after he was elected to his second term and the message on a hot mic to Medvedev getting back to Putin. “More flexibility” seems more corrupt than “smart man”

Don't lump Obama with the gangster in any way.


Meanwhile, getting back to the topic at hand: This is a good summary of what is known so far.

Comer faces make-or-break moment on Biden probe
 
#53
#53
He's been singing Putin's praises for years. Why?

"Former President Donald Trump has praised Russia's moves in Ukraine. Trump called Russian President Vladimir Putin, quote, "smart" after he recognized the independence of two breakaway regions in eastern Ukraine."

While president Trump suggested that maybe the U.S. should get out of NATO. That essentially treasonous idea is a Putin wet dream.

He's most definitely got a thing for our chief adversary/war criminal and dictators, generally. He'd like to be one himself--that's clear.

He's done--he'll soon be the male version of Norma Desmond.
Seek help. Quit visiting the echo chambers and listening to the same parrots. Seek other perspectives.

By the way Trump would be an afterthought and would have remained marginalized after the last election. The left is keeping him relevant........... Why? Think about it for a minute.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64 and 82_VOL_83
#55
#55
Right ... Shouldn't "evidence" be presented to a grand jury? If a grand jury has been convened?

It's political posturing, strategically timed to coincide with Trump's civil lawsuit verdict.

Frankly, it's a little too obvious with its true purpose to be an effective deflection.

That is up to Garland and his department. Given this, what do you think the % chance of a grand jury being created?
 
#57
#57
Are we married?

You seem to possess this mysterious ability to tell me what I am thinking and doing.

At least act like my wife...ask me and allow me to answer before you tell me how wrong i am.

You're a liberal hack. Of course you believe it's justice. You people are as cookie cutter as baking at Christmas.
 
#58
#58
Seek help. Quit visiting the echo chambers and listening to the same parrots. Seek other perspectives.

By the way Trump would be an afterthought and would have remained marginalized after the last election. The left is keeping him relevant........... Why? Think about it for a minute.
The left needs loud noises to look away.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SpaceCoastVol
#59
#59
Right ... Shouldn't "evidence" be presented to a grand jury? If a grand jury has been convened?

It's political posturing, strategically timed to coincide with Trump's civil lawsuit verdict.

Frankly, it's a little too obvious with its true purpose to be an effective deflection.
I think so. If I truly possess evidence, then I would pursue a legal recourse. To the credit of those saying the presser could lead to a legal hearing down the road, it might do that. And I hope justice is served if it makes it that far.

But to me, it feels like drama.....just like it did when your side did it.
 
#62
#62
That is up to Garland and his department. Given this, what do you think the % chance of a grand jury being created?
It won't happen ... and so House Republicans are doing nothing more than waging a war for public opinion.

The timing isn't great here. Whether it's a coincidence or not, it just looks too much like a tit-for-tat response to Trump's civil lawsuit verdict from yesterday.
 
#66
#66
I think so. If I truly possess evidence, then I would pursue a legal recourse. To the credit of those saying the presser could lead to a legal hearing down the road, it might do that. And I hope justice is served if it makes it that far.

But to me, it feels like drama.....just like it did when your side did it.

Hey McLiberal! Even if they had a smoking gun it would require the DOJ to act on it and we know that's not going to happen.

My problem with these "pressers" is they never put out the evidence, everyone knows Garland isn't going to act on it so just make the evidence public.
 
#68
#68
It won't happen ... and so House Republicans are doing nothing more than waging a war for public opinion.

The timing isn't great here. Whether it's a coincidence or not, it just looks too much like a tit-for-tat response to Trump's civil lawsuit verdict from yesterday.

The news conference was announced on May 7.
 
#70
#70
Hey McLiberal! Even if they had a smoking gun it would require the DOJ to act on it and we know that's not going to happen.

My problem with these "pressers" is they never put out the evidence, everyone knows Garland isn't going to act on it so just make the evidence public.
I can't help it you Rs are so stupid and so gullible that you'll fall for any 'news' about moderates like Joe Biden and his angelic kids.
You're gonna learn once AOC is president and you're in internment camps.
 

VN Store



Back
Top