Good leaders teach, inspire, and delegate. Tennessee has a habit of hiring coaches who fail at all three but especially the inspiration part.
That's an awfully short list to encapsulate the skill sets required for great leadership.
Big, heavy books have been written on the elements of leadership. Heck,
libraries full of those kinds of books have been written.
You know this, Tsar. I know you know this.
Yet, out of all the attributes of leadership, you chose to mention only three. I'm assuming that's because you think those are Jeremy's greatest shortcomings as a leader. They certainly weren't Fulmer's. Or Majors'. Or Neyland's.
I don't think that's necessarily right about Pruitt, either. I think one of the three you name a weakness may in fact be one of his strengths. We can't know for sure yet, but all evidence from his time as an assistant coach leans my way; the evidence from his three years as head coach is mixed. We just can't yet know.
The book on Jeremy Pruitt's leadership style, his strengths and weaknesses in command of a football program, that book is still being written. We've' only gotten through chapter 3. Some folks say you can know all there is to know about a head coach after just two or three chapters. I disagree.
Remember, the first three chapters of Nick Saban's head coaching tenure read like this: 9-2 ... 6-5-1 ... 6-6. Not to mix leadership with outcomes, but my already TL;DR response would be hella longer if we took time to dissect Nick Saban's leadership attributes after his second season at Michigan State. The point is, Saban grew and developed as a coach--as a leader--and became much more astute with time. His leadership evolved and matured.
Similarly, I think folks who stick to a premature, early-days view of Jeremy Pruitt as a leader are going to be surprised as we learn more.
But that's the fun of these boards; neither of us can yet know who's right.