How will the media handle Bidens sexual assualt allegation? NYT tweet lets us know...just amazing

[Orange_Vol1321]

Does it, though? This seems more consistent with the version where she had a problem with other members of the staff.

Not only the “out of respect” part but the fact that the police weren’t among the options...

Your daughter calls and says “my boss shoved his fingers inside my vagina.” Do you look back on that and think calling the press is the “only thing she could have done?”

You think the DC police would've done anything??
There's a slush fund to pay people off that these idiots in Congress sexually harass.

 

[Orange_Vol1321]

 

[37L1]

Q: “Did any of you try to come forward in the past with a very different allegation in which you explicitly stated that ‘nothing sexual’ took place?”

A: “No.”

Feel better?

Nice parse job. Pretty much what one would expect. I must have missed that little part of your original post that I responded to.

Oh, wait, that wasn't even mentioned.

Does it, though? This seems more consistent with the version where she had a problem with other members of the staff.

Not only the “out of respect” part but the fact that the police weren’t among the options...

Your daughter calls and says “my boss shoved his fingers inside my vagina.” Do you look back on that and think calling the press is the “only thing she could have done?”

Any more stuff you want to add to the equation while you're at it?

 

[Weezer]

Does it, though? This seems more consistent with the version where she had a problem with other members of the staff.

Not only the “out of respect” part but the fact that the police weren’t among the options...

Your daughter calls and says “my boss shoved his fingers inside my vagina.” Do you look back on that and think calling the press is the “only thing she could have done?”

Isn't it common for women NOT to report sexual assault to the police? Not sure why I'm asking, I know the answer is yes. It's extremely common for women not to go to the police. Especially in a case that boils down to he said/she said. I'm not saying he did it, I'm not saying he didn't do it, but don't change your standards on how this should be handled based on politics. There really is no excuse for the discrepancy in which the media has covered this case compared to how it has covered others. And we all know the reason is political bias. I'm not even sure how you can deny that.

 

[Bigun]

Q: “Did any of you try to come forward in the past with a very different allegation in which you explicitly stated that ‘nothing sexual’ took place?”

A: “No.”

Feel better?

The left and the media (repetitive) set the rules when they overplayed their fake outrage during the Kavanaugh trial. Now we are going to make you play by them.

 

[BigOrangeD]

The left and the media (repetitive) set the rules when they overplayed their fake outrage during the Kavanaugh trial. Now we are going to make you play by them.

But that's not fair. They are mentally challenged DIMs.

 

[evillawyer]

Nobody here said believe all women, that I recall.

I can't speak for all the resident libtards, but I know my objection to Kavanaugh was not based on what he said and did as a teenager, but on whether he was lying under oath about various things, the most obvious lies being what he said about the yearbook passages.

 

[UT_VOLS13]

I can't speak for all the resident libtards, but I know my objection to Kavanaugh was not based on what he said and did as a teenager, but on whether he was lying under oath about various things, the most obvious lies being what he said about the yearbook passages.

Why would you be upset? ALL Lawyers LIE!!! I am sure you are honest as the day is long. NOT!!

 

[Bigun]

I can't speak for all the resident libtards, but I know my objection to Kavanaugh was not based on what he said and did as a teenager, but on whether he was lying under oath about various things, the most obvious lies being what he said about the yearbook passages.

You objected to a SCOTUS being appointed for what was written in a high school yearbook?

God forbid you make your decision on his views on law and how it is applied.

"Sorry Justice, I just can't vote to appoint you because you talked about farting and drinking beer when you were in high school in a yearbook. Now if you were more like my idols Bill Clinton and Ted Kennedy, then you would be OK morally."

 

[evillawyer]

You objected to a SCOTUS being appointed for what was written in a high school yearbook?

God forbid you make your decision on his views on law and how it is applied.

"Sorry Justice, I just can't vote to appoint you because you talked about farting and drinking beer when you were in high school in a yearbook. Now if you were more like my idols Bill Clinton and Ted Kennedy, then you would be OK morally."

Read closer. My objection was not based on what he said or did in high school. My objection was based on him lying about it while under oath during a job interview broadcast to America.

 

[VolStrom]

You objected to a SCOTUS being appointed for what was written in a high school yearbook?

God forbid you make your decision on his views on law and how it is applied.

"Sorry Justice, I just can't vote to appoint you because you talked about farting and drinking beer when you were in high school in a yearbook. Now if you were more like my idols Bill Clinton and Ted Kennedy, then you would be OK morally."

This bible verse was tailored to these two.
And I looked, and behold a pale horse: and his name that sat on him was Death, and Hell followed with him.

 

[bnhunt]

at least we know that our resident libs will stand by their morals they exhibited during the Kavanaugh lynching and demand Biden drop out or at least not vote for him.

If Ms. Reade appears for a deposition or before Congress and testifies under oath where the penalty of perjury applies, then I will certainly take her allegations more seriously. This seems to be the distinction that no one on the Right wants to recognize. Dr. Ford did this and exposed herself to criminal prosecution if she lied under oath. That is a huge thing that seems to be overlooked by the red hats.

 

[bnhunt]

The left and the media (repetitive) set the rules when they overplayed their fake outrage during the Kavanaugh trial. Now we are going to make you play by them.

Sounds good. Get the alleged victim to testify under oath where she will be subject to cross-examination regarding her allegations and where the penalty of perjury applies and then we can analyze the veracity of her assertions. And hopefully we will not run the same disgusting smear campaign that the Right did to Dr. Ford, which was an absolute abomination.

 

[Bigun]

If Ms. Reade appears for a deposition or before Congress and testifies under oath where the penalty of perjury applies, then I will certainly take her allegations more seriously. This seems to be the distinction that no one on the Right wants to recognize. Dr. Ford did this and exposed herself to criminal prosecution if she lied under oath. That is a huge thing that seems to be overlooked by the red hats.

Seems pretty obvious she lied under oath to me. Not one single person she named could corroborate her story...which was a lie to begin with so not surprising.

 

[UT_VOLS13]

If Ms. Reade appears for a deposition or before Congress and testifies under oath where the penalty of perjury applies, then I will certainly take her allegations more seriously. This seems to be the distinction that no one on the Right wants to recognize. Dr. Ford did this and exposed herself to criminal prosecution if she lied under oath. That is a huge thing that seems to be overlooked by the red hats.

Dude, Ford could say whatever she wanted due to the fact that no one could refute her story. It was basically he said she said! She could say whatever she wanted under oath!

 

[bnhunt]

Seems pretty obvious she lied under oath to me. Not one single person she named could corroborate her story...which was a lie to begin with so not surprising.

If it was that obvious, then I think she would have been charged with perjury.
AP FACT CHECK: Witnesses do not exonerate Kavanaugh
Yes, There Is Plenty of Corroborating Evidence for Christine Blasey Ford's Allegations #ABLC

 

[bnhunt]

Dude, Ford could say whatever she wanted due to the fact that no one could refute her story. It was basically he said she said! She could say whatever she wanted under oath!

Lol. You can't just say whatever you want under oath. If there is truly no corroborating evidence to support her claims, then she could have been charged with perjury. That is how the system works.

 

[UT_VOLS13]

Lol. You can't just say whatever you want under oath. If there is truly no corroborating evidence to support her claims, then she could have been charged with perjury. That is how the system works.

OK, where was the corroborating evidence?

 

[BreatheUT]

The hypocrisy here is stunning but not surprising. This Biden story has legs and once again the liberals have found a way to spin their positions to be sanctimonious beginning with state run media.

 

[BreatheUT]

OK, where was the corroborating evidence?

Have you seen this person's other posts? Just asking.

 

[Carl Pickens]

Sounds good. Get the alleged victim to testify under oath where she will be subject to cross-examination regarding her allegations and where the penalty of perjury applies and then we can analyze the veracity of her assertions. And hopefully we will not run the same disgusting smear campaign that the Right did to Dr. Ford, which was an absolute abomination.

That biatch was as crazy as you are goofy

 

[evillawyer]

The hypocrisy here is stunning but not surprising. This Biden story has legs and once again the liberals have found a way to spin their positions to be sanctimonious being with state run media.

Which of the libs on here are shouting for the story to be buried (compare to the Blasey Ford and Kavanaugh story)? It's been covered by every major outlet. No one is calling for them to dial it back. No one is saying the woman shouldn't be able to tell her story, that journalists shouldn't be able to ask about it etc.

 

[BreatheUT]

Which of the libs on here are shouting for the story to be buried (compare to the Blasey Ford and Kavanaugh story)? It's been covered by every major outlet. No one is calling for them to dial it back. No one is saying the woman shouldn't be able to tell her story, that journalists shouldn't be able to ask about it etc.

Is there evidence CNN and MSNBC, or any other state run media has covered this story after "working like heck" to destroy Kavanaugh with a person that seemed coo coo for coco puffs that democrats helped to invent?

 

[bnhunt]

OK, where was the corroborating evidence?

Yes, There Is Plenty of Corroborating Evidence for Christine Blasey Ford's Allegations #ABLC

 

[bnhunt]

That biatch was as crazy as you are goofy

That "biatch" has an undergrad degree from UNC, masters from Pepperdine and Stanford, and a doctorate from USC. I know you're smarter than everyone else on here, but how you compare there, buddy?
Christine Blasey Ford - Wikipedia