How will the media handle Bidens sexual assualt allegation? NYT tweet lets us know...just amazing

#376
#376
#377
#377
 
  • Like
Reactions: imw8n4u and Purple Tiger
#378
#378
bnhunt said:
Yes, There Is Plenty of Corroborating Evidence for Christine Blasey Ford's Allegations #ABLC
Click to expand...
Not one witness named by Dr. Blasey Ford corroborated her story, not one. You base your "evidence" of corroboration from a person who writes opinion under a column named "Angy Black Lady Chronicles"? Hahahahahahahahaha!

Here's her closing summary, did you even read it?

So is there irrefutable proof that Kavanaugh assaulted Ford? No. But his behavior during the Senate Judiciary Committee hearing is all the irrefutable proof I need that Kavanaugh is unfit to serve as an associate justice to the Supreme Court.

I'll counter you with these:

https://nypost.com/2018/09/25/eight-big-problems-for-christine-blasey-fords-story/

WALSH: The Single Biggest Hole In Christine Ford’s Story

21 Reasons Not To Believe Ford's Claims About Justice Kavanaugh

Holes in Christine Blasey Ford's testimony cast doubt that Brett Kavanaugh was her assailant
 
  • Like
Reactions: BlackCreekVol, tennvols77 and Zues1
#379
#379
Franklin Pierce said:
Ford sure as heck did not sound like an "educated" woman when she testified under oath. Instead, she came across as goofy as hell, and even child-like.
Click to expand...
She may have been slightly nervous testifying under oath with Congressmen grilling her and millions watching. Your boy Kavanaugh came across angry and red-faced too like a petulant little child.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Purple Tiger
#380
#380
bnhunt said:
Stop bringing facts in here. The entire basis of their argument is that the media hates everything Republican. It's all they got so don't take that away from them too. I call it the boogeyman argument.
Click to expand...
Has anyone in the MSM, asked Biden about the allegations? Has anyone in the MSM asked any of the Democrats that have been on the weekend talk shows about the allegations? Did the MSM cover it prior to the Larry King video coming to light?

Go ahead, compare this to the Kavanaugh/Blasey Ford incident coverage by the MSM. How about the coverage of Candidate Trump and his "indiscretions"?


iu
 
  • Like
Reactions: BreatheUT and tennvols77
#381
#381
bnhunt said:
She may have been slightly nervous testifying under oath with Congressmen grilling her and millions watching. Your boy Kavanaugh came across angry and red-faced too like a petulant little child.
Click to expand...
Just like anyone else that was being falsely accused, having his reputation besmirched in front of his family and the whole world?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rickyvol77 and BreatheUT
#382
#382
37L1 said:
Just like anyone else that was being falsely accused, having his reputation besmirched in front of his family and the whole world?
Click to expand...
Or like someone who finally got caught. How do you know it's false? You people had no problem degrading and destroying Ford without knowing whether her accusations were true or not. You do see the irony there, right?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Purple Tiger
#383
#383
bnhunt said:
Or like someone who finally got caught. How do you know it's false? You people had no problem degrading and destroying Ford without knowing whether her accusations were true or not. You do see the irony there, right?
Click to expand...
You had no problem degrading Kavanaugh without knowing the same. Weird how that works.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BlackCreekVol, tbwhhs, Rickyvol77 and 3 others
#384
#384
bnhunt said:
Or like someone who finally got caught. How do you know it's false? You people had no problem degrading and destroying Ford without knowing whether her accusations were true or not. You do see the irony there, right?
Click to expand...
Right, something that may have happened over 30 years ago, where none of her witnesses corroborated her story, where she, herself, is uncertain what exactly happened, where it happened, or when it happened. No police report has ever been made, and she comes forward, at the most opportune moment, when nothing of substance, mentioning Kavanaugh, prior?

You see the irony there, right?

Go ahead, counselor, I'd love to see you take her case to court, either criminal or civil. That would be great comedy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rickyvol77 and BreatheUT
#385
#385
0nelilreb said:
Wrong , I think quick on my feet ( it’s a gift ) and ELs doesn’t argue .. just moves on to the next tweet .
Click to expand...
I can’t imagine why he doesn’t engage with people who just repeat things they thought up earlier in response to different arguments.

Kavanaugh was the main media focus for several weeks. It was basically the only thing going on at that time. Coronavirus is a much bigger story that’s taking up even more air time (since cable news seems to be your barometer) than Kavanaugh was. And it should be. Because there’s a justifiably larger story going on, Reade’s allegations aren’t going to get the same play. Could/should they get more? Yes. Should they get the same? No. Not right now.

If you think that’s ridiculous, there’s something wrong with you.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Purple Tiger
#386
#386
Weezer said:
You had no problem degrading Kavanaugh without knowing the same. Weird how that works.
Click to expand...
I didn't degrade Kavanaugh, although I think the evidence and testimony support Dr. Ford's assertions as I have previously stated on numerous occasions.
 
#387
#387
37L1 said:
Right, something that may have happened over 30 years ago, where none of her witnesses corroborated her story, where she, herself, is uncertain what exactly happened, where it happened, or when it happened. No police report has ever been made, and she comes forward, at the most opportune moment, when nothing of substance, mentioning Kavanaugh, prior?

You see the irony there, right?

Go ahead, counselor, I'd love to see you take her case to court, either criminal or civil. That would be great comedy.
Click to expand...
One question - what did Dr. Ford gain from this? And don't say she was some political operative for the Dems who was just waiting 30 years for the right opportunity. An actual motive. She was destroyed and lambasted by the Right, so that certainly did not benefit her at all.
 
#388
#388
bnhunt said:
One question - what did Dr. Ford gain from this? And don't say she was some political operative for the Dems who was just waiting 30 years for the right opportunity. An actual motive. She was destroyed and lambasted by the Right, so that certainly did not benefit her at all.
Click to expand...
This has been asked and answered. I'm guessing you didn't like the answers.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 37L1, Rickyvol77 and tennvols77
#391
#391
37L1 said:
That's funny, but I don't recall you making the same point with the "other version(s)" in Dr. Christine Blasey Ford's tale, but I didn't go back and check your posting history to be sure. If I'm wrong about that, I'm sure you'll prove it, won't you? If you are able to, I apologize in advance. If not, well. . .

Christine Blasey Ford can't keep her Kavanaugh assault story straight
Click to expand...
RockyTop85 said:
Definitely a weak case, nothing earth shattering there. The narrative is already pivoting to White House limiting the investigation and Kavanaugh lying to the committee.

Both of those were easily avoidable, unforced errors. Who would want a Supreme Court Justice who thought drinking in college was shameful, criminal, or disqualifying? If there’s nothing to fear from an investigation, why set limits? Tell them to get it wrapped up in a week and turn them loose.

So much dumb from this administration.
Click to expand...
Calling it a “weak case” good enough for you?
 
#392
#392
RockyTop85 said:
Pickens just rusted that old toothpick you’re calling a saber. Kavanaugh was the only thing happening in fall 2018. This is not going to get that much coverage right now. And it shouldn’t.

Should it get more than it has gotten? Yes.
Should it get the same amount as Kavanaugh? No. Not right now.
Click to expand...
Not the same amount, but Biden’s story still has not received as much attention even adjusted for the difference in timing and pandemic. If you don’t think the media is liberally biased then I’m not sure what to say
 
#393
#393
Orange_Vol1321 said:
A sexual assault allegation against the former Vice President that's currently running for President? Yes.

Lets be honest here. If this virus wasn't around they not only wouldn't be talking about this allegation, they also wouldn't be mentioning his deteriorating health that's so obvious.
Click to expand...

Last sentence...../end
 
#394
#394
Carl Pickens said:
Not the same amount, but Biden’s story still has not received as much attention even adjusted for the difference in timing and pandemic. If you don’t think the media is liberally biased then I’m not sure what to say
Click to expand...
I agree that this hasn’t received as much attention as it warrants. I said as much in the post you quoted.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Carl Pickens and tennvols77
#395
#395
RockyTop85 said:
I can’t imagine why he doesn’t engage with people who just repeat things they thought up earlier in response to different arguments.

Kavanaugh was the main media focus for several weeks. It was basically the only thing going on at that time. Coronavirus is a much bigger story that’s taking up even more air time (since cable news seems to be your barometer) than Kavanaugh was. And it should be. Because there’s a justifiably larger story going on, Reade’s allegations aren’t going to get the same play. Could/should they get more? Yes. Should they get the same? No. Not right now.

If you think that’s ridiculous, there’s something wrong with you.
Click to expand...

I can’t imagine why lawyers try to convince people that stupid comments / ideas are anything but that , but all of you do . I’ve tried to figure it out as to if it’s nature or nurture but for the life of me i can’t . Since most are liberal , I usual just go with nurture and ego .
 
#396
#396
RockyTop85 said:
Calling it a “weak case” good enough for you?
Click to expand...
Pretty weak but it's at least something. Maybe if you had stopped there but the rest of that post kind of undermines your "boldly stepping forth." I noticed you didn't go any further than that, or did you? That's kind of telling, particularly when you've already gone further regarding the victim's story in Biden's case.

Why, do you suppose that is?
 
#398
#398
bnhunt said:
I didn't degrade Kavanaugh, although I think the evidence and testimony support Dr. Ford's assertions as I have previously stated on numerous occasions.
Click to expand...
What evidence and whose testimony, outside of her own really fuzzy recollections.

Would you take her case to court, criminal or civil?

No, of course you wouldn't, and you know why. Because of the lack of proof and evidence.
 
#399
#399
Timing is everything. This "new" allegation has been waiting in the wings for Biden to become the sole challenger. Just like the Cavenaugh deal was revealed at the time of
his confirmation. The fake news press is driving this country!
 
  • Like
Reactions: 0nelilreb
#400
#400
0nelilreb said:
I can’t imagine why lawyers try to convince people that stupid comments / ideas are anything but that , but all of you do . I’ve tried to figure it out as to if it’s nature or nurture but for the life of me i can’t . Since most are liberal , I usual just go with nurture and ego .
Click to expand...
Idk what you’re talking about. I told you what I thought and you kept trying to argue with what you think somebody else thinks. Do you have a disagreement with what I just said, or not?
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top