I am on the fence

#51
#51
KingtUT said:
You people and all your "Kiffin facts"..... Doesnt matter what anybody else is doing or what anybody else has done, what matters is who we have right now isnt getting it done. You dont need to spew worthless facts to prove it. Anyone with eyes can see he isnt getting it done. Get over it.

I want Dooley gone too, but damn. Kiffin isnt doing very good with what he has now and I sure dont give a sh*t what he did while he was here.
Click to expand...
he is lot better than what we have now.
 
#54
#54
you got that right how can a top teir program not be able to hire a proven coach it just blows my mind instead they go and hire a 3-4 D line coach thats unproven just because a coach is on "sabans" staff doesnt mean he is the man for the job they need to find someone now
 
#55
#55
huskyvol said:
You can't use the offense as a reason to keep him. With the athletes we have plus the improvement of the o-line and rb's it should be a given to perform very well. I don't think any of the improvement is from anything Dooley has done except hiring good position coaches for the offense. With giving him credit for the hiring of the offensive coaches he also deserves all the negative credit for whatever you want to call the so called defense.
Click to expand...

So the offense being good is not because of him but because of the players....but the defense being bad is because of him and not the players or the DC coordinator...

I get it VN....you want him to go...but at least make sense on everything you throw on Dooley. It seems like all the negatives are his fault, but if it is a positive he had nothing to do with it.
 
#56
#56
led0321 said:
Short of hiring Gruden I don't know that firing him is a good thing. Firing Sunseri might be LOL
Click to expand...

The cognitive dissonance between what you see with your eyes on Saturday and what you're wondering in your heart on Tuesday must be tremendous. And it must've taken every bit of it to include the words "might be" in that last sentence.... :ermm:
 
#57
#57
bigeasy said:
So the offense being good is not because of him but because of the players....but the defense being bad is because of him and not the players or the DC coordinator...

I get it VN....you want him to go...but at least make sense on everything you throw on Dooley. It seems like all the negatives are his fault, but if it is a positive he had nothing to do with it.
Click to expand...

He's not a position coach anymore. As Head Coach, he's responsible and accountable for ALL OF IT.

If his offense deserves an A and his defense is practically a zero (F-), plus his special teams are overall maybe a B, then that means his overall grade would be a low C at best. Add in that he has dropped off our recruiting significantly (as discussed in another thread), and he's more like a high D. But he's being paid $2M a year to coach at one of the greatest football programs of all time. D or even C is NOT GOOD ENOUGH. He was hired to get us back to where we should be, not to equivocate us with Vandy and Kentucky.

It looks to me like a lot of the people who are happy with a coach producing bad results overall are doing the same thing that they accuse those who want a change of doing - picking and choosing what to look at.

Bottom line, in year 3 things should be trending up and moving in the right direction. If they were, people would have patience and give him more chances. But for every thing trending up or even flat there's something just as important that is plummeting downward. Coach Dooley does not seem capable of leading the overall program, so he needs to go back to position coaching somewhere else.
 
#58
#58
If nobody noticed last week, we had to use a TO in the 4th quarter on the 2pt conversion because we had 12 men on the field. Did the same against GA because we had 10 men on the field. You think Dooley would take the time to solve one problem at a time; this one has been haunting us for 3 yrs now.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top