AM64
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Feb 11, 2016
- Messages
- 28,341
- Likes
- 41,840
I just reject your appeal to authority on their “expertise” I don’t think they have a damn clue on how many drugs are coming in or where they are coming in. Thus when you lean on their authority I’m obviously going to reject that also. If you want to get pissy on that fine that’s up to you. I don’t have a conspiracy theory on it. I just think they are clueless is all. That goes on the intel also. And the only “data” they have is interdiction data. I don’t offer this as fact it’s just my opinion. But I will submit as fact that they don’t know how much drugs or coming in. And before you offer it... estimates are not facts. It gets back to whether you believe the estimate. Again I think they’re clueless.
On the Trump TDS laced UAV comment, over the next decade expect more penetration into our every day lives on this kind of technology. It isn’t dirt cheap yet but it will be within our lifetimes. But it’s already a small fraction of cost compared to the drugs it’s carrying. It’s just like the disposable manned small planes they used to use. Only drones are way more versatile.
The best part for the operators is that they are pretty anonymous. Even if our law enforcement/military can track guidance to an operator in Mexico, they have no jurisdiction there. The people on this end can simply fade away if they see things going bad. Whoever interdicts the UAV has a big toy and some drugs but both are easily replaceable. Now the money going the other way is a very very different story ... grab that and there is real pain with or without the carriers.