I presume that you have not read
Decision Points. These decisions are not as simple as you would like to believe they are in your make believe world. Things to consider:
- Probability that bin Laden was in the compound. This was not certain; in fact, it was far from it. The CIA could only state with certainty that it was more than likely that an HVT resided in the compound: 60-80% it could be bin Laden.
- The compound was located within Pakistan, a sovereign nation that we are not at war with. I imagine that Obama made sure that his cabinet and their attorneys understood the legal ramifications of this action, should anything go wrong.
- The compound was located in close proximity to a Pakistani Military Base; seeing as how we were not going to tip-off Pakistan about the raid, what happens if those military forces respond aggressively to our presence? Is there a contingency plan? What is that contingency plan? Do we have QRFs ready to respond? What is the disposition and strength of the QRF?
- What do we do if the compound is rigged as an HBIED? Do we have statements prepared for that contingency? How does the QRF respond in that situation?
- What do we do if bin Laden is in the compound? What are the pros and cons of taking him alive? What are the pros and cons of killing him? Which directive do we give? How do we couch that directive in terms that are legal?
I am quite sure that this is only the starting point for all the considerations of these decisions. I am also sure that "sleep on it" also means that the staff and the cabinet secretaries would be researching and presenting answers to these questions throughout the night in order to brief the POTUS first thing in the morning.
If you have ever been a part of an MDMP, you would understand that the contingencies and the various details that must be addressed are countless and everything works off of assumptions.