"In disputable video evidence" redefined

#1

volmoon

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 19, 2006
Messages
2,865
Likes
2,355
#1
Until tonight, the rule for overturning a call on the field required "indisputable video evidence." Tonight, the call was reversed without video evidence of THE BALL advancing for a first down. There was no video evidence of the ball crossing the first down line.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 46 people
#5
#5
Yeah, he was over. he would have had to been holding the ball by his knees for the original spot to stand.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 6 people
#6
#6
There's not many people who will sensibly argue that the spot was in our favor, but the issue is the fact that the replay official overturned the call with indisputable video evidence that the ball crossed the line.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 15 people
#13
#13
Sure, It looked like a first down, but you couldn't see the ball cross the line. if you can't see the ball cross the line, you can't over turn it. That is how the rule works. period.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 23 people
#15
#15
There's not many people who will sensibly argue that the spot was in our favor, but the issue is the fact that the replay official overturned the call with indisputable video evidence that the ball crossed the line.

Yes...we had home cooking for 30 seconds on that call.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#16
#16
The yellow line is not accurate. So with that said you can't go by him getting to that line. And with that said you can't clearly say he made the first down marker without seeing the ball. That was a bad overturn.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4 people
#19
#19
Yes I do believe he crossed the line but the ball was spotted short and there was no replay that actually showed the ball. You can assume the ball was somewhere but if you can't actually see it then you cannot overturn the spot no matter how bad it was.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 7 people
#20
#20
On that last Vandy drive, deep in their own territory, Jaq blows up the play to the back in the flat, but he had a CLEAR push directly in the back by the OL. That would have pushed them back another 10yrds or half the distance to the goal. Ref's never called it. I was blown away. The called Pig Howard on a questionable block in the back, that erased a winning score...and refuse to call a classic block in the back, right where the ball was.

We can't catch a break from the officiating crews this season
 
  • Like
Reactions: 5 people
#23
#23
It was a first down, but it should've never come down to that. During the drive one of our DBs was called for a face mask, but it was the receiver who grabbed the face mask.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 7 people
#24
#24
Yes we all know that it obviously went past the line, but I think the issue people are having is the initial call was that he was short, and in the replay you actually never see the ball. So i will agree he obviously had it, but it was not indisputable.
 

VN Store



Back
Top