Iowa vs. Mizzou - Insight Bowl

#31
#31
Idk how you can overturn that? BS call imo.
Posted via VolNation Mobile

No kidding. All of the refs should be fired. Not only was it a catch but they overturned it saying it wasn't. Beyond cheat.
 
#38
#38
Took the dog out during that review so I can't really comment either way. I'll take your word for it though.

My bad then. If not for that call, might have been a good game. It was just a horrible call overturning it in my opinion and it robbed Missouri of the chance to win.
 
#41
#41
My bad then. If not for that call, might have been a good game. It was just a horrible call overturning it in my opinion and it robbed Missouri of the chance to win.

I still can't believe that Gabbert didn't throw the ball away. If he doesn't throw the pick, the game probably doesn't come down to that catch.
 
#42
#42
I still can't believe that Gabbert didn't throw the ball away. If he doesn't throw the pick, the game probably doesn't come down to that catch.

That's also true. I won't deny that. That mistake shouldn't have cost him his chance for redemption though. The refs completely robbed him of the chance to make up for that interception.

I thought replays were suppose to make the game better. So they could make the correct call on a bang-bang play. Instead, half the time the calls are made the wrong anyways after viewing the replay. Might as well just eliminate challenges.
 
#44
#44
That's also true. I won't deny that. That mistake shouldn't have cost him his chance for redemption though. The refs completely robbed him of the chance to make up for that interception.

I thought replays were suppose to make the game better. So they could make the correct call on a bang-bang play. Instead, half the time the calls are made the wrong anyways after viewing the replay. Might as well just eliminate challenges.


I completely agree about the redemption part. I do think replays do get it right for the most part though.

I did see the replay on Sportscenter and they clearly did get this one wrong. It was a called a catch on the field and there was no indisputable evidence to overturn it. I see the beef that you and others have with the call.
 
#45
#45
Shame that what was a good game had to end on a bad call. Gabbert completely blew it, though.

31 points lost. Thanks, Mizzou.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
#48
#48
Definitely NOT a catch and a good reversal. The commentators said it wasn't a catch but didn't think they would overturn. There are some stills floating around the internet today that show the ball sitting on the turf.

Great game and win for the Hawks!
:dance2:
 
#49
#49
Here's one, don't feel like looking for the rest.

MIZZOUNOCATCH-1.jpg
 
#50
#50
Definitely NOT a catch and a good reversal. The commentators said it wasn't a catch but didn't think they would overturn. There are some stills floating around the internet today that show the ball sitting on the turf.

Great game and win for the Hawks!
:dance2:

Yeah... you're not bias at all. Nor were the refs.

It's not a great win when the refs give it to you. Iowa players were face masking earlier in the game too and the refs just looked the other way.

Having to live in Iowa and having defended them to people who hate them, I can say without a doubt that you are blind and the Hawkeyes suck. Believe me, I know. I live 5 minutes from Kinnick.
 

VN Store



Back
Top