MothershipChip
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Apr 6, 2011
- Messages
- 177
- Likes
- 0
You can continue these semantics all day long, but we, as fans, have been watching Hopson in games for three years, so i don't care what CCM meant. It's irrelevant to this conversation. In fact this is the first of anyone referencing any of his statements in this particular conversation. Why it was done to begin with makes no sense.
I appreciate your insight on hoops LawVol, but you are going down a road for no reason here... It's semantics like this that water down boards where honest discussions are trying to be had.
Going back and forth on what I meant, when I've now pointed out what I meant three times since the original statement, brings nothing to the conversation.
EDIT: And whether anyone here likes it or not, it's my opinion and it's certainly arguable. Not that it matters much, though, because in the end I imagine neither one of them will see a court in the NBA. But if you feel strongly that I am way off base with my opinion I suppose I should pipe down because you've proven yourself to be highly respected in college coaching circles with your hoops knowledge on X's and O's. Hence the reason you are posting on a Vols message board like the rest of us.
Now you're just blatantly lying and trying to backtrack.
At no point in this thread was my argument directed to anything other than the narrow point of Hopson's athleticism (i.e. is he the best athlete in the draft). I mocked you because you responded to a post where I cited the opinion of NBA scouts on the question of Hopson's athleticism by referring to me as a "Hopson fluffer". The mocking was completely warranted, and I don't feel a bit bad about it.
Here is the conversation that actually took place:
(1) It started with me saying this:
(2) You responded to #1 by calling me a "Hopson fluffer" (post has been removed)
(3) ocho responded to #1 with the following ridiculous statement:
(4) therickbol responded to #1 with the following:
(5) I responded to #2 with a link to the Chad Ford article where he states that several scouts have told him that Hopson is the best athlete in the draft. I indciated to you that I would no longer be doing your research for you, and then I believe I mentioned something about a short bus (post was removed).
(6) I responded to #3 with the same link, but without any additional commentary about a short bus. This post remains intact (#128).
(7) I responded to #4 by referring to my above post that included the link.
(8) ocho responded to #6 with the following painfully moronic statement:
(9) therickbol responded to #7 with a similarly ridiculous post that ostensibly questioned the amount of weight that should be given to the opinions of NBA scouts:
(10) I responded to #8 with the following:
(11) I responded to #9 with the following:
(12) You then wrote the fictional post that I quoted and discussed at the very top.
Going forward, if you could stay on topic and try to refrain from referring to conversations that never happened, or happened (a) solely in the confines of your own head or (b) with your favorite teletubby.
Who's saying Scotty will be a lottery pick?
1. Guy averaged 17 ppg last season and we didn't even run an offense.
2. Scotty can play defense, it's just a matter of him deciding to do so.
I just really don't think Bruce pushed Scotty all that much, same for some other guys that were always in the lineup despite their play. Scotty is capable of making a team in the NBA whether he comes back or not. It's all up to Scotty, I seriously doubt Scotty would float while trying to make an NBA team.
I do think if he came back he'd be much improved and/or dominant, but I really don't see why he straight up has to come back to make the league.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
Who's saying Scotty will be a lottery pick?
1. Guy averaged 17 ppg last season and we didn't even run an offense.
2. Scotty can play defense, it's just a matter of him deciding to do so.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
So he's never going to play in the NBA then?He averaged 17 points against defenders much weaker than anything he will see in the NBA. How did he perform against teams that had good defensive game plans for him? How about when he was guarded by NBA type defenders like Taylor from Vanderbilt? Defense is about intensity, quickness and anticipation. Contrary to popular belief, it is not just 'want to' at the NBA level. His 'want to' is not going to allow him to guard above average NBA 2 guards.
So he's never going to play in the NBA then?
Posted via VolNation Mobile
if All-American Lofton can't make an NBA team then Hopson has no business.
I personally don't think so. Imagine Hopson with Kobe Bryant or Tony Allen defending him. Having your feet planted behind the 3 point line with your hands out doesn't cut it in the NBA.
So you assume he's going to play exactly the way he did at UT on his NBA team? I just can't imagine that with a new team and new coach.
Hopson is 10 times the athlete Lofton is and is also 6 inches taller. Lofton can't make the NBA because the only thing he can do at an elite level is shoot, and he's only 6'1" and incapable of playing the point or creating his own shot.
Kidbourbon has to know that Hopson is an idiot if he enters the draft. He will not be even close to a lottery pick and the simple reasons can be summarized
1. He has never shown he can play defense.
2. He has never been productive in a half court offense.
Those are the two areas he can remedy if he comes back to UT, or he can get Jared Karnes to get him a contract overseas for being good at dunking. It may not end up being as lucrative as the contract Lofton gets for being great at shooting.