Is the extortion of an allied country to investigate a political opponent an impeachable offense by the President?

Is the extortion of an allied country to investigate a political opponent an impeachable offense?

  • Yes.

    Votes: 25 61.0%

  • No.

    Votes: 16 39.0%

  • Undecided.

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Total voters
    41
#28
#28
NorthDallas40 said:
No need to. Thus far it’s 7 people really trying hard to sell a loaded narrative, 1 person gullible enough to take the bait, and everybody else wisely choosing to ignore a BS loaded question. I’d guess that ratio will even get wider.
Click to expand...

He asked a hypothetical question trying to establish a threshold of what’s impeachable. He’s basically asking “if what the democrats allege is proven, would you agree with impeachment.” At least that’s how I see it.

It’s not how I would have asked it, but I do think it’s fair game to ask people to articulate what facts, if proven, would convince them to support impeachment. And, honestly, this way has some advantages for Trumpists because it articulates a clear narrative with a fairly high bar, just like collusion did with the Mueller probe.

Unless the Trumpist answer is “none,” the answer effectively roots the goalposts for them, too. I don’t think many people have the courage or trust Trump enough to tie themselves to simply defending Trump on proof.

I don’t think most people realize that being unwilling to answer that question says a lot about their faith in Trump.

None of this is directed at you. To your credit, you have been, AFAIK, the only Trump supporter here to directly and clearly answer that question and express what you believe to be impeachable conduct.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NashVol11 and tvolsfan
#29
#29
RockyTop85 said:
He asked a hypothetical question trying to establish a threshold of what’s impeachable. He’s basically asking “if what the democrats allege is proven, would you agree with impeachment.” At least that’s how I see it.

It’s not how I would have asked it, but I do think it’s fair game to ask people to articulate what facts, if proven, would convince them to support impeachment. And, honestly, this way has some advantages for Trumpists because it articulates a clear narrative with a fairly high bar, just like collusion did with the Mueller probe.

Unless the Trumpist answer is “none,” the answer effectively roots the goalposts for them, too. I don’t think many people have the courage or trust Trump enough to tie themselves to simply defending Trump on proof.

I don’t think most people realize that being unwilling to answer that question says a lot about their faith in Trump.

None of this is directed at you. To your credit, you have been, AFAIK, the only Trump supporter here to directly and clearly answer that question and express what you believe to be impeachable conduct.
Click to expand...
Instead of masking this in the BS way it was done I’d just prefer the honest exchange you and I had on it. You engaged in good faith and I responded in kind. Working as intended. The replies in this thread clearly point to the sales job and the poll response clearly shows that also is working as intended.
 
#31
#31
volfanjustin said:
When the extortion never happened and is a made up hoax from the radical left, no it's not an impeachable offense. Next
Click to expand...
And that would be the “yes that kind of conduct is clearly impeachable however no such proof has been provided” option however since the poll was loaded to purposely avoid an honest distribution on the answers we’ve got this BS. Like I said above working as intended.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DC_Vol, hUTch2002, dezul and 1 other person
#32
#32
NorthDallas40 said:
Instead of masking this in the BS way it was done I’d just prefer the honest exchange you and I had on it. You engaged in good faith and I responded in kind. Working as intended. The replies in this thread clearly point to the sales job and the poll response clearly shows that also is working as intended.
Click to expand...

Curious. I'd be interested in the exact wording of how you would ask the question at hand - relevant to the current impeachment inquiry.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tvolsfan
#36
#36
NorthDallas40 said:
No need to. Thus far it’s 7 people really trying hard to sell a loaded narrative, 1 person gullible enough to take the bait, and everybody else wisely choosing to ignore a BS loaded question. I’d guess that ratio will even get wider.
Click to expand...
Exactly. What a complete waste of time. But I'll bet Monty feels good about it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NorthDallas40
#38
#38
NorthDallas40 said:
And that would be the “yes that kind of conduct is clearly impeachable however no such proof has been provided” option however since the poll was loaded to purposely avoid an honest distribution on the answers we’ve got this BS. Like I said above working as intended.
Click to expand...
So people who determine that proof has been provided should demand impeachment.
 
#40
#40
RockyTop85 said:
He asked a hypothetical question trying to establish a threshold of what’s impeachable. He’s basically asking “if what the democrats allege is proven, would you agree with impeachment.” At least that’s how I see it.

It’s not how I would have asked it, but I do think it’s fair game to ask people to articulate what facts, if proven, would convince them to support impeachment. And, honestly, this way has some advantages for Trumpists because it articulates a clear narrative with a fairly high bar, just like collusion did with the Mueller probe.

Unless the Trumpist answer is “none,” the answer effectively roots the goalposts for them, too. I don’t think many people have the courage or trust Trump enough to tie themselves to simply defending Trump on proof.

I don’t think most people realize that being unwilling to answer that question says a lot about their faith in Trump.

None of this is directed at you. To your credit, you have been, AFAIK, the only Trump supporter here to directly and clearly answer that question and express what you believe to be impeachable conduct.
Click to expand...
Oh bullsqueeze. Not answering an obviously bias 'poll' does nothing of the sort.
 
#41
#41
luthervol said:
So people who determine that proof has been provided should demand impeachment.
Click to expand...
Bring charges then.

Shiff is just marking time to get closer to the election with the hopes that the economy tanks. It's your only hope.
 
#46
#46
RockyTop85 said:
What conduct would convince you that Trump should be removed from office?
Click to expand...
That’s too broad you’re smarter than that. Just ask a pointed topic specific to the question at hand. Is extortion, which is the current narrative no longer quid pro quo that was a dry hole, an impeachable offense. And then give a spectrum of possible responses which doesn’t imprint the desired biased outcome. (Like this dumb ass thread did)
 
#49
#49
I suppose extortion by an official of other foreign officials, if it can be proved, would be a "high crime". It would be impeachable. Just hope the now gleeful anti-Trumpers would hold any of their future Democrat presidents to the same standard. Somehow I doubt it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: davethevol, NashVol11, MontyPython and 2 others
#50
#50
Mick said:
I will go with zero. What are you going to go with?
Click to expand...
Fusion GPS received their funding from the DNC/Clinton campaign (one in the same since the Clinton's bailed out the party) and Uranium One was a deal struck where the Clinton Foundation cut the deal in exchange for donations to the Clinton Foundation.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Obsessed
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top