- Joined
- Jul 7, 2008
- Messages
- 89,295
- Likes
- 37,832
A big disagreement with Vol fans is Trae Golden. Almost everyone agrees that he's a good player, and our second MVP behind Jeronne Maymon. But is he a PG? Let's look at some stats.
The big thing with Golden is turnovers. He's averaging right at three per game, and has the third most turnovers per game in the conference. It isn't a good stat. However, looking at his TO%, which tells us how many turnovers he commits per 100 possessions, he's ranked in the middle of the pack for SEC PG's with 23.2%. So while he averages a good amount of turnovers, he's averaging almost 32 minutes per game. Which is better? A point guard who gives the ball up three times playing 32 minutes, or a point guard who gives the ball up twice in 25 minutes? The former.
Despite Trae's struggles with turnovers, he's very good at distributing the ball. He's averaging 4.7 APG, third in conference. Impressive, but not as impressive as the next stat. His assist percentage (An estimate for the percentage of player assists based on all possible assist opportunity (FGM)--adjusted for playing time) is second in conference at 32.1%. He's basically getting an assist 32% of the possessions for UT. That's very good, especially because of UT's slower pace. That makes him second overall in the conference.
What's most impressive though about Trae is his shooting prowess, which is the most underrated part of his game. His slash line if pretty good for a sophomore guard: 44.4/37.3/82.5, especially after last year's shooting performance. But he's very effective inside the arc. He's shooting 42.8% on all two pointers, 6th for all guards in the SEC. His effective and true shooting percentages are also very good (52.0 and 57.4 respectively) and are both top 20 in the SEC. And for guards, those rank 9th and 8th respectively. Looking at the stats, Trae is one of the ten best offensive guards in the SEC.
Overall, Trae is one of the better guards in the SEC, especially when you consider his defensive improvement over the year. While he still has some weaknesses, he is become a true threat at the point guard position, and while he's has the reputation of being a score first point guard, he's still one of the better passing guards in the league. He lacks consistency, and struggles against quicker guards who can beat him to the spot. However, I think Trae has what it takes to become a very good point guard, especially when you consider the improvements he has made this year. If he continues to improve, can be one of the best point guards in the SEC.
The big thing with Golden is turnovers. He's averaging right at three per game, and has the third most turnovers per game in the conference. It isn't a good stat. However, looking at his TO%, which tells us how many turnovers he commits per 100 possessions, he's ranked in the middle of the pack for SEC PG's with 23.2%. So while he averages a good amount of turnovers, he's averaging almost 32 minutes per game. Which is better? A point guard who gives the ball up three times playing 32 minutes, or a point guard who gives the ball up twice in 25 minutes? The former.
Despite Trae's struggles with turnovers, he's very good at distributing the ball. He's averaging 4.7 APG, third in conference. Impressive, but not as impressive as the next stat. His assist percentage (An estimate for the percentage of player assists based on all possible assist opportunity (FGM)--adjusted for playing time) is second in conference at 32.1%. He's basically getting an assist 32% of the possessions for UT. That's very good, especially because of UT's slower pace. That makes him second overall in the conference.
What's most impressive though about Trae is his shooting prowess, which is the most underrated part of his game. His slash line if pretty good for a sophomore guard: 44.4/37.3/82.5, especially after last year's shooting performance. But he's very effective inside the arc. He's shooting 42.8% on all two pointers, 6th for all guards in the SEC. His effective and true shooting percentages are also very good (52.0 and 57.4 respectively) and are both top 20 in the SEC. And for guards, those rank 9th and 8th respectively. Looking at the stats, Trae is one of the ten best offensive guards in the SEC.
Overall, Trae is one of the better guards in the SEC, especially when you consider his defensive improvement over the year. While he still has some weaknesses, he is become a true threat at the point guard position, and while he's has the reputation of being a score first point guard, he's still one of the better passing guards in the league. He lacks consistency, and struggles against quicker guards who can beat him to the spot. However, I think Trae has what it takes to become a very good point guard, especially when you consider the improvements he has made this year. If he continues to improve, can be one of the best point guards in the SEC.
Last edited: