Is Trae Golden the PG of the future?

#28
#28
IF you weren't too busy being an ass you would have seen I never said NBA, nice try though.

You said I wouldn't go that far yet when I mentioned him playing professionally. You were referring to NBA I'm pretty sure because most people realize he could walk away from TN right this second and go play professionally, cmon man.
 
#30
#30
You said I wouldn't go that far yet when I mentioned him playing professionally. You were referring to NBA I'm pretty sure because most people realize he could walk away from TN right this second and go play professionally, cmon man.

Once again, if you weren't being an ass. I am meaning I think he would be better at the 2.

Just because somebody doesn't agree with every little assessment you make, doesn't mean they are wrong.
 
#32
#32
Once again, if you weren't being an ass. I am meaning I think he would be better at the 2.

Just because somebody doesn't agree with every little assessment you make, doesn't mean they are wrong.

Yet earlier in this thread you say you have no problem with him playing point?

So you weren't going as far in reference to his future being at the 1?
 
#36
#36
Well since you both said it I figured I'd respond to both.

Professionally doesn't solely mean NBA. Am I right,

The fact you brought up Brian Williams in your argument says more negatively about Trae than positive. Does the term professionally cover the Flint Michigan Tropics?
 
#38
#38
At UT, he would be even better at the 2, his natural position.

This was your first post in the thread...

Other than that, no problems at all really with him. He can still become something really special for us.

You sound just fine with him being our PG, yet when I say that's his future position you say you wouldn't go that far?
 
#43
#43
But you said BOTH of us said it, and we BOTH clearly did NOT!!

The way you worded it that we both didn't say it i thought you saying neither of us said it, my apologies.

I also thought you saying I wouldn't go that far was in reference to him playing professionally.

If it was about his future being at the 1 not the 2 then ok that's completely different. As I said though I thought from reading your posts you seemed pretty content with him at PG.
 
#44
#44
The way you worded it that we both didn't say it i thought you saying neither of us said it, my apologies.

I also thought you saying I wouldn't go that far was in reference to him playing professionally.

If it was about his future being at the 1 not the 2 then ok that's completely different. As I said though I thought from reading your posts you seemed pretty content with him at PG.

If you weren't so quick to jumping to being a smart ass a lot of the times, you wouldn't make that mistake.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#45
#45
Well if that's the only factor you consider when determining a player's ability... heard Justin Bieber is getting paid to play tonight. Bieber>Golden?

No they don't get paid to play in the celebrity game.

Proffesionally adj:

Engaging in a given activity as a source of livelihood or as a career: a professional writer.

Performed by persons receiving pay: professional football.

Trae golden playing overseas for pay doesn't fit that definition?
 
#46
#46
If you weren't so quick to jumping to being a smart ass a lot of the times, you wouldn't make that mistake.

Ok as I said my apologies.

I'm still perplexed that in your post earlier you're more than content with him as your PG.

Now after I say his future is at the 1, you say you wouldn't go that far?

Those are 2 completely opposite meanings.
 
#47
#47
Ok as I said my apologies.

I'm still perplexed that in your post earlier you're more than content with him as your PG.

Now after I say his future is at the 1, you say you wouldn't go that far?

Those are 2 completely opposite meanings.

Mainly because we have nobody else, and playing PG at UT and playing professionally are different.
 
#48
#48
Mainly because we have nobody else, and playing PG at UT and playing professionally are different.

I'm still not understanding your stance...

So his future at UT and proffesionaly is or isn't at PG? In your opinion

Exactly this year we have nobody, next year either do his future at UT is at PG right?

I think most realize that proffesionally his position is PG mo doubt.
 
#49
#49
Ok as I said my apologies.

I'm still perplexed that in your post earlier you're more than content with him as your PG.

Now after I say his future is at the 1, you say you wouldn't go that far?

Those are 2 completely opposite meanings.

Didn't read the posts, but common sense would tell me if he's content that would mean currently. And that he would prefer a true PG in the future. I know I'm really going out on a limb..
 

VN Store



Back
Top