Israel vs Palestinians

[NashVol11]

Sure it is.

No it's not, peaceful anti-genocide protests are not terrorism

 

[walkenvol]

No it's not, peaceful anti-genocide protests are not terrorism

No one has a right to enter a private educational building and disrupt a classroom to make a “protest”. Go to a legal public location to protest as is allowed in our country.

 

[Smokey123]

No one has a right to enter a private educational building and disrupt a classroom to make a “protest”. Go to a legal public location to protest as is allowed in our country.

That doesn’t mean it makes someone a terrorist tho

 

[NashVol11]

No one has a right to enter a private educational building and disrupt a classroom to make a “protest”. Go to a legal public location to protest as is allowed in our country.

This has nothing to do with what you quoted

 

[walkenvol]

That doesn’t mean it makes someone a terrorist tho

Agreed - not a terrorist, just a criminal for trespassing. Don’t lose sight of the fact these people are in the wrong with their actions for not following the law. Same as illegal migrants are in the wrong for not following the laws the way countless other legal immigrants have done.

 

[NashVol11]

Agreed - not a terrorist, just a criminal for trespassing. Don’t lose sight of the fact these people are in the wrong with their actions for not following the law. Same as illegal migrants are in the wrong for not following the laws the way countless other legal immigrants have done.

If they're students it's not "criminal trespassing" either

 

[Vol8188]

Nothing about that is "terrorist"

Intimidation for political means, isn’t that the basic definition

 

[walkenvol]

If they're students it's not "criminal trespassing" either

If they’re students, then they should be disciplined for interrupting a class. Students aren’t entitled to conceal their identities and barge into and take control of a classroom in which they are not enrolled. You are trying to play the semantics game. There’s no scenario in which these folks are not in the wrong.

 

[NashVol11]

If they’re students, then they should be disciplined for interrupting a class. Students aren’t entitled to conceal their identities and barge into and take control of a classroom in which they are not enrolled. You are trying to play the semantics game. There’s no scenario in which these folks are not in the wrong.

The only misleading semantics would be calling them terrorists, if semantics are your issue then you should be arguing with Slice and not me

 

[walkenvol]

"The semantics game" would be calling them terrorists, if semantics are your issue then you should be arguing with Slice and not me

You’re the one who responded to my post to which I responded back to you. My whole point is this type of disruption on private property is wrong and should be addressed. I fully support anyone’s right to protest legally and peacefully according to US law. If you don’t feel the same then OK - agree to disagree.

 

[NashVol11]

You’re the one who responded to my post to which I responded back to you.

Yeah because you responded to a post about terrorism with something completely unrelated to terrorism, which is the label that is by far the most semantically dishonest

 

[Vol8188]

Yeah because you responded to a post about terrorism with something completely unrelated to terrorism, which is the label that is by far the most semantically dishonest

Were they attempting to intimidate others? Yes

Was their objective political in nature? Yes

Aren’t those the two basic elements of term “terrorism”?

Also legal definitions can vary by state but if you knowingly enter somewhere you know you’re unwanted, what element of criminal trespassing are we missing here?

 

[NashVol11]

Were they attempting to intimidate others? Yes

Was their objective political in nature? Yes

Aren’t those the two basic elements of term “terrorism”?

Also legal definitions can vary by state but if you knowingly enter somewhere you know you’re unwanted, what element of criminal trespassing are we missing here?

Lol at reading a prepared statement in a classroom being "intimidating others," every protest must be an "intimidation" then. Was it ChatGPT or your own personal choice to leave out the key word "violence"?

 

[Orangeslice13]

No it's not, peaceful anti-genocide protests are not terrorism

Nope
They’re dressed like Hamas terriorist spouting nonsense propaganda from the Hamas terrorist talking points. They gave their warnings. Next they blow **** up…..along with themselves if we’re lucky

 

[Orangeslice13]

Intimidation for political means, isn’t that the basic definition

They dressed like terrorist for a reason.

 

[NashVol11]

Winter coats and blue jeans is dressing like a terrorist?

 

[Vol8188]

Lol at reading a prepared statement in a classroom being "intimidating others," every protest must be an "intimidation" then. Was it ChatGPT or your own personal choice to leave out the key word "violence"?

There’s an implication of violence in that for sure.

 

[Smokey123]

Were they attempting to intimidate others? Yes

Was their objective political in nature? Yes

Aren’t those the two basic elements of term “terrorism”?

Also legal definitions can vary by state but if you knowingly enter somewhere you know you’re unwanted, what element of criminal trespassing are we missing here?

Wait… so that’s terrorism but Hamas wasn’t a terrorist group when they started in the 80’s and 90’s when they were sending suicide bombers and kidnapping IDF members because they wanted to kill all Jews? Lmaoooo you’re a joke dude and don’t know what you’re talking about

 

[Smokey123]

Nope
They’re dressed like Hamas terriorist spouting nonsense propaganda from the Hamas terrorist talking points. They gave their warnings. Next they blow **** up…..along with themselves if we’re lucky

Ironic coming from you… you liked a comment yesterday saying Hamas wasn’t a terrorist group when they started

 

[ETV]

No it's not, peaceful anti-genocide protests are not terrorism

Peaceful. Ok.

Disruptive and disrespectful. Absolutely. Had it been the opposite, the faux outrage from the left would have been one for the ages.

 

[Orangeburst]

Are those Levi jeans?

 

[NashVol11]

Peaceful. Ok.

Disruptive and disrespectful. Absolutely. Had it been the opposite, the faux outrage from the left would have been one for the ages.

Had it been the opposite, I sure as hell wouldn't be calling it terrorism

 

[NashVol11]

Are those Levi jeans?

Hamas brand denims

 

[ETV]

Had it been the opposite, I sure as hell wouldn't be calling it terrorism

But it didn’t happen and likely never will.
There’s the difference. There’s no Zionist genocide agenda in play here.

 

[Orangeslice13]

Winter coats and blue jeans is dressing like a terrorist?

This is some high quality trolling.