Israel vs Palestinians

You mean the guy that was taken into custody for it? Which is what the protests was over because that doesnā€™t happen in the middle of a war. Netanyahu, Halevi and Gallant all condemned the protests.

Rape and murder is bad no matter who does it meanwhile you have terrorist sympathizers that defend it
 
  • Like
Reactions: Orangeslice13
You mean the guy that was taken into custody for it? Which is what the protests was over because that doesnā€™t happen in the middle of a war. Netanyahu, Halevi and Gallant all condemned the protests.

Rape and murder is bad no matter who does it meanwhile you have terrorist sympathizers that defend it

So you don't care when the NYT lies about Israel's crimes. Rape isn't a story because Netanyahu publicly condemned it? I don't understand.
 
  • Like
Reactions: EasternVol
So you don't care when the NYT lies about Israel's crimes. Rape isn't a story because Netanyahu publicly condemned it? I don't understand.

Even worse than that: the New York Times didn't publish a single report on the Palestinian trials of the Gazans that murdered, raped, and kidnapped Israeli citizens. By not reporting on those trials, the NYT is trying to act like they never even happened!
 
Kindly show where I defend that. You're completely FOS to say I do. You, on the other hand, actively defend the IDF doing effectively the same.
When you continuously attack the Israelis for legitimate self defense, you are providing aid and comfort to confirmed terrorists. Stop defending the indefensible. Hamas and the large majority of ā€œPalestiniansā€ who celebrate and support it are demonic. Rejoin the human race and condemn barbarians.
 
To those claiming that the Gaza civilians are ā€œinnocentā€. Nope, not anymore. They turn out en mass to CELEBRATE the cold blooded and deliberate murder of Children. They are complicit now.
Forget worrying about the Israelis if you are Gazan. God Himself will bring judgement for this.

Yes civilians aren't civilians anymore because you fell for a tweet from "VividProwess" that is definitely 100% accurate
 
  • Like
Reactions: EasternVol
Even worse than that: the New York Times didn't publish a single report on the Palestinian trials of the Gazans that murdered, raped, and kidnapped Israeli citizens. By not reporting on those trials, the NYT is trying to act like they never even happened!
Five Israeli soldiers torturing a POW (which they were charged for) is totally the same thing as the systemic mass rape of women and girls at the hands of the Palestinians.
 
Ironic considering this reply from you:
That's not ironic. He did meet with Netanyahu as reported by Netanyahu, which you can see in the tweet, and if you view it on Twitter you can also see that the Committee to Protect Journalists noted that 82/124 killed were killed by Israel. Everything there is sourced in an obvious way
 
  • Like
Reactions: EasternVol
That's not ironic. He did meet with Netanyahu as reported by Netanyahu, which you can see in the tweet, and if you view it on Twitter you can also see that the Committee to Protect Journalists noted that 82/124 killed were killed by Israel. Everything there is sourced in an obvious way
DropSiteNews sounds very reputable. That's the irony.
 
So you don't care when the NYT lies about Israel's crimes. Rape isn't a story because Netanyahu publicly condemned it? I don't understand.
I think that part of the complexity for an entity like the NYT legal "terms of art" that apply in different jurisdictions.

For instance, in NC, the conduct described by Ms. Rad, while horrific, is not "rape", it is a "sexual offense." The difference may not be significant to the population as a whole, but as shown in Trump's civil settlement with CBS a couple months ago, the terminology matters to the courts.

Maybe the NYT is being protective of Israel. But maybe they are just being protective of their pocketbooks.
 
That's not ironic. He did meet with Netanyahu as reported by Netanyahu, which you can see in the tweet, and if you view it on Twitter you can also see that the Committee to Protect Journalists noted that 82/124 killed were killed by Israel. Everything there is sourced in an obvious way
Here are some things not defined in the tweet. 124 journalist were killed last year. Were all of those legit journalists? Were the legit journalists targeted by Israel or collateral damage?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Vol8188
So Palestinians civilians (not Hamas) held a mother, her 4 year old, and her 9 month old as hostages.

Theyā€™re now dead. They were held by civilians. Abducted by civilians.

And yet so many on here want to pretend Hamas and the people of Gaza are two separate entities.

The people support Hamas. The people openly aid Hamas. The people are Hamas

If you truly believe thereā€™s so many people in Gaza who are innocent (I agree some are), you should support Trumpā€™s idea of getting them out from under the control of Hamas (both by removing Hamas and removing the refugees)
 
Last edited:
To those claiming that the Gaza civilians are ā€œinnocentā€. Nope, not anymore. They turn out en mass to CELEBRATE the cold blooded and deliberate murder of Children. They are complicit now.
Forget worrying about the Israelis if you are Gazan. God Himself will bring judgement for this.

I called for tactical nukes not long ago and wasnā€™t received well. So now, Iā€™ll call on carpet bombings of the entire Gaza Strip with B52ā€™s with no warnings or evacuation orders. Call it an old school ā€œoperationā€ so it last for days like in Vietnam. Give Israel the planes on borrowed terms.
 
I'm sure the information's out there. You'd also find many instances of the IDF targeting reporters wearing press markings and acting as reporters. It's almost like they don't want the world to see what's happening there.
Of course the Pollyannas who have asinne ideas about the IDF, like they're the most moral military in the world or some such absolute BS, want to think that the dead journos were really terrorists.
On the other hand I've seen video and read first hand accounts of people with press and medic markings giving direct support and in some cases taking up arms against Israel police and soldiers.

Is it that they don't want people see what's happening or that they don't trust terrorists not to use terrorist tactics?

My answer: the truth is likely in the middle, soldiers don't trust based on experience, and they may not want people covering the war from Palestinian POV.
 
When you continuously attack the Israelis for legitimate self defense, you are providing aid and comfort to confirmed terrorists. Stop defending the indefensible. Hamas and the large majority of ā€œPalestiniansā€ who celebrate and support it are demonic. Rejoin the human race and condemn barbarians.
Are you Chubby Checker? Because that's a real twist.
I don't attack the Israelis for legitimate self defense. I attack them for their barbarism.
 

VN Store



Back
Top