Israel vs Palestinians

The “context added” was just “actually they weren’t youths, they were in their 20s”

Lmao
Holy **** this moron thing has to be an act. You can’t actually be this stupid.

The context added was the speculation on civilians and reason for being there which the twitter spin master has no way of knowing. The incorrect statement on age was error, not added context. See Easterns post if you’re still confused.
 
Mid-20's isn't youth, true. But hardly geriactrics.
Maybe they knew what they were doing and maybe not. I can't refute their take and neither can you.
There's no indication from the clip that they're armed or Hamas. So killing them isn't copacetic, which is the key point.
Killing them was a go/ no go decision for the drone operator.
That’s how those things work. (The key point)
We have them in the United States too.
There are lines that if you cross them they will kill you, no questions asked. I would recommend you don’t cross those lines. It would be bad for your health.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: rekinhavoc
Killing them was a go/ no go decision for the drone operator.
That’s how those things work.
We have them in the United States too.
There are lines that if you cross them they will kill you, no questions asked. I would recommend you don’t cross those lines. It would be bad for your health.
Maybe innocents wouldn't die if the military of hamas wore uniforms. They don't. So even if innocent, military age Gaza folks got a problem. Probably should blame the government they elected.
 
Maybe innocents wouldn't die if the military of hamas wore uniforms. They don't. So even if innocent, military age Gaza folks got a problem. Probably should blame the government they elected.
It seems like the IDF just caught a bunch of Hamas hiding in a hospital too. It seems like that’s the kinda behavior that would also get innocent people killed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: rekinhavoc
Holy **** this moron thing has to be an act. You can’t actually be this stupid.

The context added was the speculation on civilians and reason for being there which the twitter spin master has no way of knowing. The incorrect statement on age was error, not added context. See Easterns post if you’re still confused.
A bunch of "we don't know," which was the rest of your post, doesn't add any context to the video. That's the opposite of context lol, you don't know what the context is
 
  • Like
Reactions: TOUCHDOWN!!TN
Killing them was a go/ no go decision for the drone operator.
That’s how those things work. (The key point)
We have them in the United States too.
There are lines that if you cross them they will kill you, no questions asked. I would recommend you don’t cross those lines. It would be bad for your health.
You sure dance a lot to try to justify murder. Cha cha cha.
But it's not justifiable.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NashVol11
They were in the no go zone, no?
“Active combat zone” was Israel’s excuse when they got caught with their pants down, and not only have you just accepted that uncritically, you turned it into “they told them if you go there, you die” which you’re more than welcome to back up with sources
 
“Active combat zone” was Israel’s excuse when they got caught with their pants down, and not only have you just accepted that uncritically, you turned it into “they told them if you go there, you die” which you’re more than welcome to back up with sources

Do you ever get anything right. Constantly correcting you is exhausting.
It was not defined as an “active combat zone “. There are different rules for that. It was a “no go” zone which means anyone who goes there dies. That’s the rules they ….and every military in the world….established. We have those zones in the USA. Not long ago some morons decided they were going to rush one of them and a bunch of people came to the location. They didn’t rush the base because our military let them know a week ahead that it was serious and anyone who crossed the line would die.

You not liking these rules of engagement are irrelevant and so are your feelies about it.
 
I haven't read it but they say the US resolution plays with words and isn't a strong call for ceasefire. Maybe we're hurting our own best interests with our undying devotion to Israel and making Russia and China look good at the same time.
If I read it correctly Israel was against our cease fire too.

and after reading the other proposal which would supposedly make the Raffah offensive impossible, I am not sure how it was measurably any different. The other cease fire used stronger language, but it didn't establish any real negatives if the attack happened, or who was really going to enforce it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: EasternVol
Do you ever get anything right. Constantly correcting you is exhausting.
It was not defined as an “active combat zone “. There are different rules for that. It was a “no go” zone which means anyone who goes there dies. That’s the rules they ….and every military in the world….established. We have those zones in the USA. Not long ago some morons decided they were going to rush one of them and a bunch of people came to the location. They didn’t rush the base because our military let them know a week ahead that it was serious and anyone who crossed the line would die.

You not liking these rules of engagement are irrelevant and so are your feelies about it.
Still waiting on that source 🙂 the fact that Israel is “investigating” this indicates that even they don’t agree with you
 
  • Like
Reactions: EasternVol

VN Store



Back
Top