Rasputin_Vol
"Slava Ukraina"
- Joined
- Aug 14, 2007
- Messages
- 72,056
- Likes
- 39,845
Actually they’re more doing the opposite.My message for the „students“
View attachment 636612
So if it was the kkk or proud boys camping on all these campuses would they get the same lenient treatment and support from the university administrations?Nope.
There is no limit on Freedom of Speech per se. It is only when you begin to infringe on others property rights that you are, rightfully, limited.
You can stand in Times Square and say you believe all the Jews should be gassed.
You cannot stand in Times Square and say “I am going to kill all the Jews in Times Square”.
Is there any evidence of that stabbing?The line is when you start repeating Hamas lines calling for the elimination of Jews and of Israel. You can’t quote terrorist slogans and not expect to be called a terrorist
This below is clearly over the line. Do you agree
View attachment 636616
Also, a Young Jewish Lady got stabbed in the eye the other night with a Palestinian flag. Again, line crossed.
So you don't support a group that's resorted to violence or terror to resolve their complaints?Someone could be forgiven for saying „The Germans have some legitimate complaints about the way Poland treats its German minority“ on Aug 31, 1939. Bit on September 2, no one wanted to hear it.
Saying something critical is one thing. Supporting someone who resorted to violence and terror to deal with their complaints however, is something else entirely. The government freely elected by the Palestinian people decided to cross the Rubicon. They lost any ability to control the course of events after that. It’s war now. And war will continue to its unavoidable conclusion. The dregs at the bottom of the cup are indeed bitter. But Hamas chose to pour that vintage into their people’s chalice. And verbally supporting that Hamas government is exactly the same as standing up in late 1939 and saying „That Hitler chap does make a few good points“. You are free to say it under the first amendment (as long as we are not involved as a combatant in the war); but you should not expect to be considered a member of polite society any longer.
One person holding a sign and one person claiming to be "stabbed in the eye" for a media tour when nothing happened. Very 1930s GermanyThis below is clearly over the line. Do you agree
View attachment 636616
Also, a Young Jewish Lady got stabbed in the eye the other night with a Palestinian flag. Again, line crossed.
The Boston Tea Party was a terrorist act...So you don't support a group that's resorted to violence or terror to resolve their complaints?
You should have a look at the Zionists in the 30's and 40's. And the settlers in the WB up to today. And those doing bomb runs on Gaza. The list goes on.
The quote “one would have to be a fool to not notice how much power Jewish people have held in the US. Especially in the financial part.” Is very disturbing to me. It is one of the oldest and most readily identifiable antisemetic tropes in existence. It was quite common to hear on the streets of Munich in the 1920s and 30s being repeated by a bunch of guys wearing brown shirts and carrying torches. Every time I think the human race has gotten over such dark thoughts, they reappear to trouble mankind. Please please PLEASE give this some more reflection and thought. We have seen where this path leads if unchecked
![]()
Antisemitism Uncovered: Myth – Jews Have Too Much Power
At the core of this myth is the belief that Jews do not deserve power, regardless of values. It also relies on claims of Jews controlling global affairs.antisemitism.adl.org
Have we seen people show up to pro-Israel protests to start fights, then claiming to be "stabbed in the eye" when nothing happened and parlaying that into a media tour? Have we seen people screeching about how it's Islamophobic that their couscous isn't called Palestinian couscous? Until we do, you can spare me the lazy "both sides" takesI'm sure every pro Israeli protest has the same Palestinian or pro Palestinian supporter doing the same. That's typically how protests go.
if you assume that is the ONLY source, and the path of reasoning he took.You’re making this more complicated than it is.
“33k” is the total number being tossed about by every major news source reporting on this as “The Death Toll in Gaza”.
The # comes from the Gaza Health Ministry.
They don’t distinguish. That is All deaths.
So if you use that number being reported everywhere and tag “innocents” on the back - it’s pretty self explanatory.
The bold.Wait. I thought the right was claiming that the left is too pro Israel.
I'm very confused. You need to pick a fake issue to tie to Democrats and stick with that.
because both sides bring their own biases.
israel wants to have lower civilian deaths so they don't look bad, and conversely more Hamas deaths so they appear more efficient. So they are going to claim more deaths as Hamas than they actually know.
Hamas wants to have both sides. more civilian deaths just shows how bad Israel is, while also making themselves look better with fewer deaths. but also fewer civilian deaths would mean they are actually protecting their people. so its a mixed bag of possible biases from them.
Hamas has claimed that 6k of its "soldiers" have died. that is hardly the 0 you were throwing out there. and while it doesn't match the historical trend for 10x civilian deaths, it is much much closer to that than the 12k dead Hamasians (?) Israel claims.
we know both sides are lying, I just don't pretend that my biased side would somehow be better in that lying.
like I said you cherry pick and twist. Those were SOME of my words. You are lying through omission.Maybe if you gave up the silly charade in here (that no one is buying) you could keep from falling over dizzy.
These are your words -
Yea, you threw a lot of crap out there trying to cover all bases, and I guess keep up the illusion in your own mind.
Hamas wants dead Palestinians in the streets.
Hamas needs dead Palestinians in the streets.
The notion that Hamas is protecting their people, that Hamas wants to limit civilian casualties. It’s laughable.
Start flights how? By being confrontational? Again that happens at most protests.Have we seen people show up to pro-Israel protests to start fights, then claiming to be "stabbed in the eye" when nothing happened and parlaying that into a media tour? Have we seen people screeching about how it's Islamophobic that their couscous isn't called Palestinian couscous? Until we do, you can spare me the lazy "both sides" takes