Israel vs Palestinians

Wrong
Again adding what you want and addressing that instead of what is said
You said the protestors at Columbia are rich white kids. I said that’s oversimplifying and inaccurate because it is. Columbia has a good number of Black, brown, Muslim and Palestinian students, many of whom are participating in these protests among others. No need to pretend it’s just white kids
 
You said the protestors at Columbia are rich white kids. I said that’s oversimplifying and inaccurate because it is. Columbia has a good number of Black, brown, Muslim and Palestinian students, many of whom are participating in these protests among others. No need to pretend it’s just white kids
go look at the film of the protest.
The makeup of the mob is irrelevant to the percentage of the makeup of students. And I’m sure they participate in protests. But this protest was Lilly white.

Again you are not talking about what I’m talking about.
 
go look at the film of the protest.
The makeup of the mob is irrelevant to the percentage of the makeup of students. And I’m sure they participate in protests. But this protest was Lilly white.

Again you are not talking about what I’m talking about.
If you think you can tell from one video that the protestors are all white kids who don’t know anything about the conflict, then I was right, conservative media has done a number on you.

Here & Now’s Celeste Headlee speaks with one of the student protesters at Columbia named Layal, who was born in Palestinian territories and is helping to support people who are now camping on the school’s west lawn.
 
Ok, show me which protestors have been taken to court with that “legal precedent”
Look it up and see if you can figure it out.
You’re going to need to look up law as opposed to who’s been charged.

I shouldn’t need to tell you that but you seem to be having issues reading what I’m saying and understanding it.
 
Look it up and see if you can figure it out.
You’re going to need to look up law as opposed to who’s been charged.

I shouldn’t need to tell you that but you seem to be having issues reading what I’m saying and understanding it.
You are telling me there is no legal case against them :) good talk
 
If you think you can tell from one video that the protestors are all white kids who don’t know anything about the conflict, then I was right, conservative media has done a number on you.
Do you think there’s some type of game being played?
Is there some scoring mechanism you keep in your head?
Or are your convictions so fragile that you need to assign your a nefarious reason to someone else to explain why they don’t agree with you?

Seriously, it’s almost every post.
 
Do you think there’s some type of game being played?
Is there some scoring mechanism you keep in your head?
Or are your convictions so fragile that you need to assign your a nefarious reason to someone else to explain why they don’t agree with you?

Seriously, it’s almost every post.
Because I said it’s inaccurate to say the protestors are all rich white kids who don’t understand the conflict, based on nothing more than your view of one video? Lol ok
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rasputin_Vol
I understand that you are focusing on “legal precedent” rather than the far more meaningful “legal cases” because there aren’t any
I’m not focusing, I said what I meant.
Legal precedent was just set that if someone assaults a Jew during the protest and they chanted anything the victim perceived as antisemitism then they can be charged with a hate crime.

Will there be cases?
We will see, but nothing you said after my comment is relevant to what I said.
 
I’m not focusing, I said what I meant.
Legal precedent was just set that if someone assaults a Jew during the protest and they chanted anything the victim perceived as antisemitism then they can be charged with a hate crime.

Will there be cases?
We will see, but nothing you said after my comment is relevant to what I said.
That has nothing to do with whether “intifada” in a chant is hate speech, which is why there are zero cases lol. You said “chanting genocide” and now are pointing to precedent that requires assault as a component, if they were “chanting for genocide” you wouldn’t need assault as a hook
 
If you think you can tell from one video that the protestors are all white kids who don’t know anything about the conflict, then I was right, conservative media has done a number on you.
I haven't read anything he's said, but I'm trying to understand where he's going with this rich white kid flex. Rich white kids were marching for civil rights in the 1960s, but they were directly impacted by Jim Crow.

I don't understand the flex here. Can white people not comprehend the situation without having 10 ties down in Gaza?
 
  • Like
Reactions: NashVol11
I haven't read anything he's said, but I'm trying to understand where he's going with this rich white kid flex. Rich white kids were marching for civil rights in the 1960s, but they were directly impacted by Jim Crow.

I don't understand the flex here. Can white people not comprehend the situation without having 10 ties down in Gaza?
When people don’t agree with protests, they have to paint the protestors as soft rich white kids, not really caring and jumping on the bandwagon because someone told them to. Tale as old as time.

Sorry, that’s incomplete. Soft rich kids WHO ARE ALSO DANGEROUSLY VIOLENT lol
 
When people don’t agree with protests, they have to paint the protestors as soft rich white kids, not really caring and jumping on the bandwagon because someone told them to. Tale as old as time.

Sorry, that’s incomplete. Soft rich kids WHO ARE ALSO DANGEROUSLY VIOLENT lol
I'm on record as saying that I think you have a mixture if people at these protests. Some that are just looking for attention, some that are genuine and some that may just be following a fad. But, I think that the danger for the Zionists and genocide supporters is if one of these goon cops or national guard guys decides to create a Kent State event, then you will unify these different groups into a single genuine cause that is bigger than the Palestinian cause and public sentiment could (could) change. I say "could" because I think some of these Boomers and MAGA folk would probably harden their stance if we had college aged protesters being popped.
 
I'm on record as saying that I think you have a mixture if people at these protests. Some that are just looking for attention, some that are genuine and some that may just be following a fad. But, I think that the danger for the Zionists and genocide supporters is if one of these goon cops or national guard guys decides to create a Kent State event, then you will unify these different groups into a single genuine cause that is bigger than the Palestinian cause and public sentiment could (could) change. I say "could" because I think some of these Boomers and MAGA folk would probably harden their stance if we had college aged protesters being popped.
Yeah
That is all we need is for some college kids to get popped. Do you even Phvkn think before you post nonsense like this?
 
That has nothing to do with whether “intifada” in a chant is hate speech, which is why there are zero cases lol. You said “chanting genocide” and now are pointing to precedent that requires assault as a component, if they were “chanting for genocide” you wouldn’t need assault as a hook
Again with the lol.
Are you trying to convince yourself of something or do you not know what “lol” means? And honestly I thought we were beyond that.

There may or may not be cases. That’s irrelevant to what was set last week. The legal standard has been set and people can now be charged with the hate crime rider. You not liking it or even knowing about it doesn’t change anything regardless of how many “lol”s you try to convince yourself with.

And after reading the rest of that I’m not sure you understand how hate crimes work.

Round and round and round we go.
I can’t wait to see where your next flight of ideas takes us.
 
I haven't read anything he's said, but I'm trying to understand where he's going with this rich white kid flex. Rich white kids were marching for civil rights in the 1960s, but they were directly impacted by Jim Crow.

I don't understand the flex here. Can white people not comprehend the situation without having 10 ties down in Gaza?
Sure you have
You can’t help yourself.
It feeds you.
 
Again with the lol.
Are you trying to convince yourself of something or do you not know what “lol” means? And honestly I thought we were beyond that.

There may or may not be cases. That’s irrelevant to what was set last week. The legal standard has been set and people can now be charged with the hate crime rider. You not liking it or even knowing about it doesn’t change anything regardless of how many “lol”s you try to convince yourself with.

And after reading the rest of that I’m not sure you understand how hate crimes work.

Round and round and round we go.
I can’t wait to see where your next flight of ideas takes us.
I will set aside the rest and just point out that you said the legal precedent was set that “globalize the intifada” = “chants for genocide” when the unsourced precedent that you yourself brought up doesn’t say that at all.
 

VN Store



Back
Top