n_huffhines
What's it gonna cost?
- Joined
- Mar 11, 2009
- Messages
- 88,556
- Likes
- 53,507
So go to JUCO and go where you want, like Kamara or Cam. Im sorry, if Im a coach Im not letting Peyton Manning wake up one morning and decide hes going to Bama because his girlfriend broke up with him last night.
He's everything they hoped he would be and they still benched him. He didn't break team rules. He didn't fail in the classroom or fail to put the work in. He played well from the get-go, got hurt, and it turned out somebody else was better than him. No idea why anybody thinks it's right or OK for UGA to stand in the way of his best future.
It's ****ing bananas that this BS is allowed.
He can do like Baker Mayfield did Texas Tech he left and walked on at Oklahoma out of no were!!!Will Georgia QB Jacob Eason transfer? That's the 'million dollar' question
Good article on Eason and if he will transfer. One would think yes given the success of Fromm and Fields enrolling this year. His talent is off the charts and has prob the biggest arm in college football. Perfect pro style QB.
Could CJP and CTH get in with Eason. This is the type of QB that is a program changer.
What you think volnation do we swing for the fences on him?
Im saying you set that precedent.
It's a feudal mentality which allows restriction of these players. Sadly, personal liberty is not a cherished value amongst many here in the US.
He had all the "personal liberty" in the world when he CHOSE to sign and commit to play for Georgia. When a player CHOOSES to break that commitment there are consequences, namely sitting out a year and leaving it up to the program's discretion to restrict transfer to certain other programs. There are no damn victim's here, jeez!
And what's wrong with that? What's wrong with being known as the team who is fair to players? I like the idea that recruits would look at us and say "If I lose my starting job to a younger player, they won't stand in my way if I transfer."
We'd win some recruits and we'd lose some bench players, but we'd be doing the right thing.
And what's wrong with that? What's wrong with being known as the team who is fair to players? I like the idea that recruits would look at us and say "If I lose my starting job to a younger player, they won't stand in my way if I transfer."
We'd win some recruits and we'd lose some bench players, but we'd be doing the right thing.
If there was no disincentive to transfer, every player could leave and go somewhere else every year. You'd have coaches recruiting players off of active NCAA rosters.
I don't have any objection to the NCAA opening up transfers during coaching changes or other unique situations, but you can't have chaos.