SamRebel35
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Apr 2, 2009
- Messages
- 15,784
- Likes
- 12,757
See post 274, directly above. That is the accuser's lawyer's statement given to TMZ earlier today.
Oh I totally missed that paragraph the first time through. You weren't saying that as your opinion but as a supposed fact iterated by the accuser's lawyer. Is that something she would be privy to, or is she just throwing shat at a wall?
That's the accuser's lawyer's rendition of events. He is saying that it was Winston's lawyer who approached them about settling, and that he flew down from Atlanta to discuss it, but opened up by saying "you client likes to ****" football players," so it blew up. He is further saying that the timing of the PR release, which claims a $7 million settlement demand, is because he knows that "Winston is about to be charged.
I am speculating openly here, but last weekend there were rumors, supposedly coming from inside the administration, that Winston was going to be expelled. Then nothing happened. One wonders whether those rumors were in fact true, and that everyone is now lining up their best arguments because if he is about to be tossed out, Winston's next stop will be NFL camps and he will have to have something to say. His best argument would be that she made it up to get money.
That could be why the timing of this. Just guessing, though.
Right. This seems plausible. But where is this second assault stuff coming from? The accuser's lawyer isn't saying that he himself thinks Winston is about to be charged. He says that Winston's lawyer seem to know it. I wonder if that is just speculation or if there is a cause for that verbiage.
Right. This seems plausible. But where is this second assault stuff coming from? The accuser's lawyer isn't saying that he himself thinks Winston is about to be charged. He says that Winston's lawyer seem to know it. I wonder if that is just speculation or if there is a cause for that verbiage.
That has the ring of anticipating really bad juju about to come out about Winston, and that its preemptive.
I see what you're saying. Agreed. This is not the action of a man that is trying to let his client's name fade to the back page of the news. It sounds like a man trying to get ahead of a story that hasn't been written yet.
I recall reading over the weekend and/or early this week the reason for the extension of the suspension from the first half to the entire game vs. Clemson was partially (if not all) the result of JW not telling FSU the entire truth about the cafeteria incident. I'm now wondering now if that is a half-truth...perhaps JW wasn't entirely forthcoming about the alleged second incident???
Shhhh.... They are "building something special" there.