At least as to 4th amendment, the curtilage does not extend to the common areas of apartment complexes such as hallways. There might be an argument for some apartment complexes, like where the front door opens on to sort of a hybrid balcony, especially if you have chairs set out. Especially under these circumstances where someone has been told to leave and may pose a threat to person or property.So now we have more of the "other side of the story" and it looks like they are trying to take a self-defense approach.
https://www.outkick.com/wp-content/uploads/20221027092021880.pdf
Now clearly we're looking at a he said-he said scenario but apparently there are witnesses that are willing to corroborate at least some of JM's account. (the assault is stated to have taken place with only JM and Spencer on the outside of a closed door) That would certainly be a plus for JM's claims.
The first question obviously is if any of this is compelling enough to have charges dropped. There's an interesting legal tangle mentioned later involving applicability of curtilage/appurtenance. I'm not certain how TN jurisprudence falls on curtilage and apartment complexes but it's my understanding that it's generally greatly curtailed vs "homes", at least regarding privacy/searches etc. Now if it really went down as described there would presumably be at least some implied protection under SYG. I suppose if curtilage stands it would only help the claim. If charges aren't dropped we're going to court.
Outside any legal issues IF JM et al. are telling the truth it's hard to have much sympathy for Spencer. How it does shake out legally we'll just have to watch.
Idk. A lawyer friend of mine suggested that losing a prelim is an embarrassment and that motion was a pretty big gamechanger and we all know lawyers love themselves
So wait, there is body camera footage of Spencer holding an empty vodka bottle while talking with the officers... and as he is admitting that he is intoxicated and going to the wrong building on the other side of the complex????So now we have more of the "other side of the story" and it looks like they are trying to take a self-defense approach.
https://www.outkick.com/wp-content/uploads/20221027092021880.pdf
Now clearly we're looking at a he said-he said scenario but apparently there are witnesses that are willing to corroborate at least some of JM's account. (the assault is stated to have taken place with only JM and Spencer on the outside of a closed door) That would certainly be a plus for JM's claims.
The first question obviously is if any of this is compelling enough to have charges dropped. There's an interesting legal tangle mentioned later involving applicability of curtilage/appurtenance. I'm not certain how TN jurisprudence falls on curtilage and apartment complexes but it's my understanding that it's generally greatly curtailed vs "homes", at least regarding privacy/searches etc. Now if it really went down as described there would presumably be at least some implied protection under SYG. I suppose if curtilage stands it would only help the claim. If charges aren't dropped we're going to court.
Outside any legal issues IF JM et al. are telling the truth it's hard to have much sympathy for Spencer. How it does shake out legally we'll just have to watch.
So wait, there is body camera footage of spencer holding an empty vodka bottle while talking with the officers... and as he is admitting that he is intoxicated and going to the wrong building on the other side of the complex????
And Jaylen is the one arressted?
Answer me this, what other time in the history of the police have they ever treated a drunk person with empty bottle standing in front of them like this?You would think this sh$t is made up, but it’s freaking real.
KPD is a joke. The Knoxville DA is a joke. Everyone who defended the drunk idiot who broke into JM’s apartment is a joke.
What's the latest on this?