hog88
Your ray of sunshine
- Joined
- Sep 30, 2008
- Messages
- 114,480
- Likes
- 162,452
It hilarious that only 1 of those tou mention is action...the rest are are words that show how mentally weak and pathetic the left is that a person's speech can effect you that much. I'd say get therapy but they'd probably push to for transition if your not already working on that like Nash seems to be hinting atNot so sure. They don't care about the "grab em by the *" tape, the sexualization of his own daughter, the hush money to a porn star, calling vets suckers and losers....etc
From my understanding is itll supposed to be a list of all involved even down to maids etc...but we will see.. basically any name associated will be torn apart in the media so whether the person is involved with the island wont matter to the majority of the population.I'm going to repeat the question because what I foresee is that if this was a list of people he simply knew people will leap to unjustified conclusions simply to score political points.
*You're.It hilarious that only 1 of those tou mention is action...the rest are are words that show how mentally weak and pathetic the left is that a person's speech can effect you that much. I'd say get therapy but they'd probably push to for transition if your not already working on that like Nash seems to be hinting at
What is silly is letting a man's words ,who you call a con man and grifter have such a profound effect on you that you lose the ability for rational thought. Your willing giving up constitutionally protected right to get 1 man. That is the sign of a weak mind and a weak base with weak ideals and no morality.*You're.
Silly me, believing words should have consequences.
I always thought it was a list of people who flew to or visited the island. The list was kept as blackmail, which allowed the Epsteins to get away with a lot of the funny money business they did.I'm going to repeat the question because what I foresee is that if this was a list of people he simply knew people will leap to unjustified conclusions simply to score political points.
which is why it should have been released day 1, instead of becoming a political issue.My point was, enemies of people on the list will call it proof positive of miscreant behavior by the enemy, but deny it for their own allies.
Its going to get abused, either way.
no guesses on individuals, but I am expecting this to have a pretty wide spread of groups represented. not just the politicians/super wealthy. I think actors, religious members, maybe even some military types, and of course plenty of unelected bureaucrats.Anyone have any out of left field guesses for who is on this list? Trump already mentioned and doesn't count.
Willing to bet we see a pretty big name that is a surprise at first then you think about it and not really. I am thinking a Mitch McConell/Gaetz/Mr. "Hammer Time" Pelosi. No way in hades a Clinton name actually makes the public list but I would look for Bill's before Chelsea.Chelsea Clinton and George stephanopoulos
I'm stoked!Willing to bet we see a pretty big name that is a surprise at first then you think about it and not really. I am thinking a Mitch McConell/Gaetz/Mr. "Hammer Time" Pelosi. No way in hades a Clinton name actually makes the public list but I would look for Bill's before Chelsea.
I would throw in some of the louder members of congress too, but a lot of them are too new to have been part of it.
does anyone know if this 177 names is supposed to be everyone? The worst of the worst? Or just the smallest names?