Jimmy Clausen...

#26
#26
Originally posted by therickbol@Nov 10, 2005 1:15 PM
Yadda yadda yadda "mobile QB" yadda yadda yadda "mobile QB"...

That is not a requirement to be a successful QB. I know one guy has already posted a list. And, the list of successful non-mobile QB's is even longer than that. Not taking a proven skilled QB because he is not mobile would be idiotic.
[snapback]187089[/snapback]​
Click to expand...

Not saying don't take him if he wants to come; Welcome, but if he wants to go to USC or ND then we don't need him; Good luck.
 
#27
#27
Originally posted by Liper@Nov 10, 2005 2:17 PM
...and I thought Marcus Vick looked really mobile last week.  He was 1 for 10 and 1INT in the 1st half, but he moved around really well.  :crazy:
[snapback]187092[/snapback]​
Click to expand...

Thats called running for your life. :focus: :twocents:
 
#28
#28
Originally posted by PineyBluff Vol@Nov 10, 2005 5:03 PM
Thats called running for your life.  :focus:  :twocents:
[snapback]187276[/snapback]​
Click to expand...

:eek:lol: :eek:lol: :eek:lol: :eek:lol: Thank you!!!!
 
#29
#29
In the NFL it's all about a pocket passer. In College Football it's all about moving the chains, which is why I think we need a mobile QB.
 
#31
#31
Originally posted by wilburnVol@Nov 10, 2005 8:02 AM
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHHAHAHHA

What a load of bullocks. Sanders was the reason Rick came to UT?

HAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

We took him in when no one else wanted him. We were Casey's 3rd or 4th choice, er, the other 3 or 4 never offered.

Jimmy Clausen doesn't come to UT for one reason.

Crompton.

Bye Daddy Clausen, hope you get your money back from your condo.  :pimp:
[snapback]186886[/snapback]​
Click to expand...



agreed. and clausen was our 3rd choice. @#$% it chris simms you have jinxed our program. not only did you turn us down you scared ken dorsey out of commiting too.

i honestly think casey wanst bad but i think ainge has much more potential.
 
#32
#32
Originally posted by GAVol@Nov 10, 2005 2:32 PM
I was talking to somebody about this the other day.  I agree with you, but the funny thing is, back in the day when a lot of teams were running the opion, I don't remember seeing very many QBs getting hurt.
[snapback]187097[/snapback]​
Click to expand...


A lot of those guys like Tommy Frazier were tailbacks. Not to mention the fact that the linebackers were 210 and 215. There were fewer people with 4.5 speed on the field as well.

My favorite option attack was led by Tracy Hamm and Raymond Gross down at GA Southern. Those guys were just elusive.
 
#33
#33
Originally posted by tvolsfan@Nov 10, 2005 8:27 PM
agreed. and clausen was our 3rd choice. @#$% it chris simms you have jinxed our program. not only did you turn us down you scared ken dorsey out of commiting too.
[snapback]187325[/snapback]​
Click to expand...

Aaaaaaaaaaaagh, that's right. :blink:
 
#34
#34
Originally posted by wilburnVol@Nov 10, 2005 7:02 AM
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHHAHAHHA

What a load of bullocks. Sanders was the reason Rick came to UT?

HAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

We took him in when no one else wanted him. We were Casey's 3rd or 4th choice, er, the other 3 or 4 never offered.

Jimmy Clausen doesn't come to UT for one reason.

Crompton.

Bye Daddy Clausen, hope you get your money back from your condo.  :pimp:
[snapback]186886[/snapback]​
Click to expand...

you dont have a clue about what your talking about, when you REALLY know something instead of just running your mouth, then people should listen to you
 
#35
#35
Jimmy Clausen is not coming to UT. I repeat, Jimmy Clausen is not coming to UT. Over.
 
#36
#36
Originally posted by wilburnVol@Nov 10, 2005 8:02 AM
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHHAHAHHA

What a load of bullocks. Sanders was the reason Rick came to UT?

HAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

We took him in when no one else wanted him. We were Casey's 3rd or 4th choice, er, the other 3 or 4 never offered.

Jimmy Clausen doesn't come to UT for one reason.

Crompton.

Bye Daddy Clausen, hope you get your money back from your condo.  :pimp:
[snapback]186886[/snapback]​
Click to expand...

Sorry you was left out. Before pointing out my post on someones honest question, do some research!
Jerk my chain if i made comments of my own opinion, NOT when i brief documents.HAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
 
#37
#37
Originally posted by gonygonygo@Nov 10, 2005 1:26 PM
Casey Clausen was a fine passer for UT.  We had plenty of suspect defenses opposite the roster when he was here.  He could put points on the scoreboard with his arm, no doubt.

People didn't like him.  Why??  Because we didn't win as much as the rest of the world would have liked.
]Even if you disagree with how good he was, you have to admit that he was way better than what we've got now. 
​
Click to expand...

Well yeah, but Joey Matthews would be better than what we've got now :D​
 
#39
#39
Originally posted by IBleedOrange24/7@Nov 11, 2005 7:51 AM
Sorry you was left out. Before pointing out my post on someones honest question, do some research!
Jerk my chain if i made comments of my own opinion, NOT when i brief documents.HAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
[snapback]187763[/snapback]​
Click to expand...

er ok

:blink: :blink: :blink: :blink: :blink: :blink:
 
#40
#40
Originally posted by Jmxvol@Nov 10, 2005 5:43 PM
In the NFL it's all about a pocket passer. In College Football it's all about moving the chains, which is why I think we need a mobile QB.
[snapback]187309[/snapback]​
Click to expand...


We'll I'll say EVERY LEVEL of football is about moving the chains.

Getting a mobile QB is fine, but it's rare to find one that has the actual tools and ability to utilize them properly in order to be successful and not be schemed out easily.

It all starts with the line of scrimmage. If that's in order, defenses will have a problem getting to you in the first place, or they'll have to blitz to get pressure, which gives many opportunities to find open receivers: of course as long as the QB doesn't panic, and hangs in to make the throw.

One problem is that people get so caught up with how hard or far someone can throw. We need a guy who can pass. There's a difference.
 
#41
#41
Originally posted by MyBloodRunnethOrange@Nov 11, 2005 9:29 AM
I didn't like him because he is a smarta$$. He was supposed to be able to beat Georgia with one hand tied behind his back :eek:lol: , yet he couldn't even take a snap from center against Florida :banghead:
Well yeah, but Joey Matthews would be better than what we've got now  :D
[snapback]187783[/snapback]​
Click to expand...

What does Brittney Jackson see in that JERK?
 
#42
#42
Originally posted by crimedawg12@Nov 11, 2005 2:01 PM
What does Brittney Jackson see in that JERK?
[snapback]188054[/snapback]​
Click to expand...

Jealous? :devilsmoke:
 
#45
#45
Originally posted by crimedawg12@Nov 11, 2005 4:01 PM
What does Brittney Jackson see in that JERK?
[snapback]188054[/snapback]​
Click to expand...



I think she likes his small hands..... :rolleyes:
 
#48
#48
Well done, turning a Jimmy Clausen thread into a Brittany Jackson thread takes time and talent. I'm proud of you all. :post-20645-1119625378:
 
#49
#49
Originally posted by Orangewhiteblood@Nov 11, 2005 8:04 PM
Well done, turning a Jimmy Clausen thread into a Brittany Jackson thread takes time and talent.  I'm proud of you all.  :post-20645-1119625378:
[snapback]188181[/snapback]​
Click to expand...


works for me..... :naughty:
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top