hog88
Your ray of sunshine
- Joined
- Sep 30, 2008
- Messages
- 115,753
- Likes
- 166,078
I'm really thinking about firing my daughter, she's been working for me this summer and I figure if I fire her;
1. She can draw unemployment while back in school
2. It gives a tiny :finger3: to Obama and these phony numbers
A win win.
209,000 jobs added in July, Unemployment rises to 6.2%
Jobs Report: U.S. Economy Adds 209,000 Jobs In July, Unemployment Ticks Up To 6.2% - Forbes
Jobs Friday today. We added only 142,000 jobs in August, the smallest increase since December, missing estimates for an increase of 225,000. Unemployment is 6.1%, from 6.2% in July. Labor force participation rate at 62.8% little changed from 62.9% in July.
Looking at the participation rate change again is an eye popper. People not in the labor force increased, and hit a new all time high record of 92,269,000. This is an increase of 268,000 for July. In other words, the number of people leaving the labor force is almost double the number of people who found jobs, 142K. Shew!!! Does anyone else smell Obamacare.
I know you are desperately grabbing on to any bad news you can find in hopes of blaming it on Obama, but you are starting look awfully silly.
There were solid job gains in several industries that tend to pay well, such as business and professional services and health care. Jobs were added in the construction sector as well, a possible sign that the housing market is continuing to bounce back.
John Canally, chief economic strategist for LPL Financial, noted that weakness in the manufacturing and retail sectors, dragged down overall job growth. He said there may be some strange seasonal, end-of-summer factors to explain that.
"My view of the job market is unchanged from where it was before this report came out. This is an anomaly," Canally said.
One expert said that it's important to remember that the August number could eventually change as well -- for the better.
"This number will be revised higher. August is the quirkiest month," said Phil Orlando, chief equity strategist with Federated Investors. "This is inconsistent with strength we're seeing elsewhere in the economy."
Recall that the government originally reported that zero (that's right, zilch) new jobs were added in August 2011. The number wound up getting revised sharply higher a couple of months later.
Whoops! Jobs recovery lost steam in August - Sep. 5, 2014
People were called right wing conspiracy nuts (remember Jack Welch) for not believing the jobs data just before the election in 2012 when the rate got below 8%. Now the same people are telling us not to believe the data. It is beyond hypocrisy.
I know you are desperately grabbing on to any bad news you can find in hopes of blaming it on Obama, but you are starting look awfully silly.
There were solid job gains in several industries that tend to pay well, such as business and professional services and health care. Jobs were added in the construction sector as well, a possible sign that the housing market is continuing to bounce back.
John Canally, chief economic strategist for LPL Financial, noted that weakness in the manufacturing and retail sectors, dragged down overall job growth. He said there may be some strange seasonal, end-of-summer factors to explain that.
"My view of the job market is unchanged from where it was before this report came out. This is an anomaly," Canally said.
One expert said that it's important to remember that the August number could eventually change as well -- for the better.
"This number will be revised higher. August is the quirkiest month," said Phil Orlando, chief equity strategist with Federated Investors. "This is inconsistent with strength we're seeing elsewhere in the economy."
Recall that the government originally reported that zero (that's right, zilch) new jobs were added in August 2011. The number wound up getting revised sharply higher a couple of months later.
Whoops! Jobs recovery lost steam in August - Sep. 5, 2014
Nice try, but no one is saying believe or don't believe one month's worth of data, especially when historically that particular month is underreported and revised upward.
The trend is the indicator, not one entry on the sheet. The trend is in the correct direction. Is it awesome? No. Is it as good as we'd all like? No. But its trending far better than it was. Let's not forget that under Bush we came, some say, within hours of complete worldwide economic collapse. Its the kind of thing it takes a decade to overcome, not just a few good years.
They also never said to watch for revised numbers when it was revised down all those months. It's like they know what's coming before it happens :question:People were called right wing conspiracy nuts (remember Jack Welch) for not believing the jobs data just before the election in 2012 when the rate got below 8%. Now the same people are telling us not to believe the data. It is beyond hypocrisy.
Nice try, but no one is saying believe or don't believe one month's worth of data, especially when historically that particular month is underreported and revised upward.
The trend is the indicator, not one entry on the sheet. The trend is in the correct direction. Is it awesome? No. Is it as good as we'd all like? No. But its trending far better than it was. Let's not forget that under Bush we came, some say, within hours of complete worldwide economic collapse. Its the kind of thing it takes a decade to overcome, not just a few good years.
Let's not forget that under Bush we came, some say, within hours of complete worldwide economic collapse. Its the kind of thing it takes a decade to overcome, not just a few good years.